Respond to each with 200 words 1 source each separated by
name and subject
CCJS 350
Shane–
4. Do you purport that
the Project Save Act (Monell article) or similar legislation is beneficial and
working to keep our schools safer?
The Project Save Act was
enacted to clarify vague language for behaviors that constitute a suspendable
offense (Project Save, 2001). Setting specific guidelines for infractions
provides clarity for school administrators to apply a standardized level of
discipline for infractions within the education system. For example, the
language requires that violent students be immediately suspended, clarifies the
definition of a violent student, and provides guidance to school administrators
for interacting with law enforcement when those violations are criminal
(Project Save, 2001).
However, I wonder if
implementing this act has had a perceived beneficial outcome on school safety.
While it has provided administrators with explicit language to guide them in
the actions they need to take in the event of an event, it does little to
affect intervention before events happen. The language in the act supports
giving the school administrators the tools to be reactive instead of proactive
in making the educational environment safer for the students. Such acts need a
stronger language that supports a proactive approach to changing behaviors instead
of a reactive approach to punishing the behaviors.
Do you support the notion that there are
disproportionate punishments in school settings (K12) as it relates to race?
Makylah
–
There are disparities in
the punishments handed out in schools based on race. This week’s reading by
Welch covers the data collected by various educational institutions in the
nation to determine the difference between the punishments given to white and
minority students. The findings supported the hypotheses presented in the study,
which indicated that the use of harsh punishments was associated with the
number of black learners in the institution. In 2018, a report released by the
Government Accountability Office revealed that African American students, as
well as those with disabilities, were punished more severely than their white
counterparts in 2013-14 (GAO, 2018). They were also more likely to be suspended
or arrested. The report showed that there were more white students in public
schools than African American students. However, there were more black learners
who were suspended.
BEHS 320
Johnathon –
As mentioned in
our readings, “historically, the characterization of the disabled in
mainstream culture has stressed their various ‘abnormalities.” After
reading the author’s description of these issues in disability culture, share
your thoughts and opinions on the same.
My thoughts about this is
that before disabilities were frowned upon and thought less of and people did
not care as much or know of what disabilities were. As time went on we
discovered and diagnosed disabilities to actually portray them as such. Media
today is not how it was yesterday or say 100+ years ago.
I think that disabilities
are more accepted today and people know more about disabilities and we have
laws in place to help the disabled. I am happy there is more knowledge about
disabilities and how to treat them as well. Without the knowledge we have there
would still be issues with treatment and ease of access. Lastly, knowing what
we know allows us to improve lives.
Christopher –
The historical
characterization of disabled individuals in mainstream culture has often been
marked by focusing on their perceived “abnormalities” rather than
their inherent dignity and capabilities (Chomba Wa Munyi, 2012). Disability has
frequently been viewed through the lens of difference, leading to negative
stereotypes, stigmatization, and marginalization.
Throughout history, many
societies have considered disability something to be feared or pitied rather
than recognized as a natural part of the human experience. Disabled individuals
have often been portrayed as objects of curiosity, amusement, or even ridicule
(Chomba Wa Munyi, 2012). Mainstream culture has sometimes emphasized physical
or cognitive differences, frequently stressing what individuals with
disabilities cannot do rather than recognizing their strengths and unique
contributions.
These historical
characterizations have perpetuated harmful misconceptions and reinforced
societal barriers. However, it’s important to note that attitudes and
perceptions have evolved. Recently, there has been a growing awareness and
advocacy for disability rights, inclusion, and empowerment (Chomba Wa
Munyi, 2012). Efforts are being made to challenge mainstream cultural
narratives, promote equality, and create more inclusive societies that value
and respect the rights and capabilities of disabled individuals.
It is crucial to continue
fostering inclusive attitudes, promoting accessibility, and celebrating the
diverse abilities of all individuals to create a more inclusive and equitable
society.
BEHS 220
Arianna –
The first thing I think
of when thinking about “single stories” of LGBTQIA+ people in our culture is
effeminate gay men. I think of the fashionable, flamboyant gay men that I would
see on TV, who were seen as less than men, maybe even less than women, who made
their sexuality their whole personality – “when LGB individuals were depicted
talking about sex, it was most likely to be about their sexual identities”
(Bond, et. al, 2019). Growing up, I only knew one gay man, and while he wasn’t
the traditional embodiment of masculinity, he certainly wasn’t like the men I
saw on TV. The effect was more profound when I think about queer women. I
cannot think of a single representation of queer women from when I was growing
up, and that took such a toll on me when I realized I was queer myself. Then,
as I got older, I heard stories about lesbians, none of which were kind. I
remember the word lesbian being a dirty word, something you called a boyish
girl who no boys had sexual interest in. Then, it was portrayed that actual
lesbians were all butch, women who secretly wanted to be men. It wasn’t until I
was an adult that I learned what femme lesbians were, and even though I no
longer identify as lesbian and simply identify as queer, I cannot begin to
describe how proud I was to have been a femme lesbian, a label that I and many
lesbians chose to reclaim (Haefele-Thomas, 2019).
I make an effort to watch
shows that are diverse, shows that depict queer people, as well as people of
color. Therefore, the last few shows and movies that I have watched have a fair
share of LGBT characters, though there are still not nearly as many being
depicted as straight characters.
If I were a director, I
would make sure that diversity on set and on screen reflected the diversity I
see in my everyday life. My life is filled with queer people, with women, with
people of color, with disabled people. And I have seen how very capable all of
them are. I would prioritize having diversity in the crew, and then do the same
with my casting.
Imani –
Someone who is homosexual
is attracted to another person of the same sex romantically or sexually
(Haefele-Thomas, A. & Combs, T. 2019). Being a homosexual in a world
of homophobic individuals can be very taunting at times. Most stories on the
LGBTQIA+ community has not been positive; it is always negative remarks and
rumors. Sometime individuals will say they have diseases even if they do not,
say they have mental issues. By listening to and interacting with members of
the LGBTQIA+ community, I have discovered these stories. I’ve had the honor of
hearing many of their experiences and tales, which has improved my
comprehension of this community’s distinctive outlook on the world. I’ve seen
several documentaries and movies that highlight the lives of LGBTQIA+
individuals, as well as books and articles written by authors and writers from
the community. It has been a remarkable and transformative experience to hear
the tales of the LGBTQIA+ community and learn from them. In recent movies
broadcasting on television, they try to incorporate more LGBTQIA+ individuals.
There are a few movies where its only about homosexuals or movies where they
are just a part of it. They are highlighted as normal individuals in most
cases. I would improve diversity in the industry by including LGBTQIA+
individuals in all my movies. They would be casted as normal individuals and
display the studies of what they actually go through. This is important so that
individuals out there who are afraid to be themselves can see that they are not
alone. There are people out there just like them, it is okay to be themselves.
BEHS 250
Justin-
- For each, describe your source, then conduct a brief analysis of the
authority and perspective. Is the authority and perspective
represented within the source clear? Does it seem to be valid?
How do you know that these two articles take different perspectives?
The removal of
confederate statues and similar odes or references to the CSA have long been
called for throughout the country. However, following the deaths of many
victims of the attacks of white supremacists, the calls increased in number, as
well as the efforts of individuals to remove the statutes themselves. The
confederate soldier monument of Durham is one such example, forcibly removed
days after the murder of Heather Heyer. Two articles depict this event in
radically different ways.
The first, “What
Did That Confederate Statue in Durham Stand For?” by Stephen M. Klugewicz, uses
the authority of its author, a historian with a doctorate, to traffic in
omissions that erode any validity for the benefit of a perspective. The author
takes a decidedly dim view of the destruction of the confederate monument,
likening those who tore down the “seemingly inoffensive monument” to a mob
chortling over the destruction it wrought (Klugewicz, 2017). He goes on to
later to engage in revisionism as to the motivations of the CSA and its member
states. However, because people speak in symbols, and symbols to them in
turn, the symbolic erection of the monument in 1924 is as clear as the aims of
the CSA: the preservation of white supremacy. The authority, which can be
determined partially by author’s professional background (CrashCourse, 2019),
is used to further a perspective that can’t be viewed as valid.
Conversely, The
HuffPost article’s perspective is guided by its authority, necessitating it
provide a more grounded reporting. Its authority stems from it being an
established and more reputable media source with the ability and willingness to
correct itself. The resulting perspective is careful and objective, giving it
an air of validity.
- Given what you read this week and your experience analyzing these
two sources, what characteristics of a social movement would result in it
being represented positively in mass media?
As Andrews and
Caren (2010) argue, all coverage of a social movement can be viewed as good, so
it may be of less concern if the coverage is positive. However, having a large
membership is implicated in garnering media attention or coverage, as shown by
the positive association between the two variables (Andrews and Caren, 2010).
Thus, having a large membership base could be a pathway by which a social
movement could get media attention, which can be viewed as positive, regardless
of the way it’s covered.
- Based on your own experience, how do you think the representations
of a social movement in mass media would be different than
the way the same movements would be represented in social media? How
does social media affect the way mass media coverage of social justice
movements is viewed and spread?
Given that media
coverage covers a routine or beat particular to it (Andrews and Caren, 201),
it’s possible that social media will cover a wider range of social movements
due to varied people using it and their niches. Also, social media exploits the
same mechanisms that govern mass media coverage, exploding into the latter
medium when it reaches a certain following and providing another avenue for it.
Nichelle –
- For each, describe your source, then conduct a brief analysis of the
authority and perspective. Is the authority and perspective
represented within the source clear? Does it seem to be valid?
How do you know that these two articles take different perspectives?
First
article I picked Is called “Mayor
orders city to purge social media of pride messages by Alex Bollinger.” It
seems the mayor has made a decision regarding social media accounts and their
references to pride month. Such actions reflect the mayor perspective on
supporting certain agendas. The decision may have been influenced by various
factors or local considerations. Public officials often make choices based on
their community’s best interests. It’s important to engage in open and
respectful dialogue to understand different perspective on these matters. A
midwestern mayor has ordered his town to purge its social media accounts of any
references to pride month, saying that the city should not engage in supporting
social agenda (Bollinger,2023). It’s wonderful to hear that the city of
Westfield, their commitment to being a welcoming and safe community for all
during pride month. Such messages of inclusivity and support can help foster a
sense of belonging and acceptance for individuals within the community.
Recognizing and celebrating diversity is an important aspect of promoting
understand and equality.
My second
article is called “Starbucks denies it banned in-store pride
decorations halfway into pride month by Shannon Thaler.” There was issue
between Starbuck workers union and Starbucks regarding the alleged ban on
in-store pride decorations during pride month. The union claims that such a
policy exists, while Starbucks denies it. Without further information, its
challenging to determine the exact nature of the situation. In the article it
stated ” Starbucks workers united tweeted on Tuesday. In the middle of
pride month, Starbucks bans pride decorations in store across the United States
(Thaler,2023).
The perspectives
are very different because one article is a news article and the other article
is more of a website for the LGBTQ, they both informative, however they are worded
different, and one had a video on it with an article.
- Given what you read this week and your experience analyzing these
two sources, what characteristics of a social movement would result in it
being represented positively in mass media?
The presentation
of a social movement in mass media can vary greatly depending on various
factor, including the media outlet, its bias, and the context in which the
movement is portrayed. While some social movements may receive positive
coverage in the mass media, others may face challenges or negative portrayals.
Positive representation in media often depends on factors such as the movement
goals, public opinion, media coverage bias, and the effectiveness of the
movement’s messaging and actions. Social movements are able to capture public
attention, gain support, and effectively communicate their objectives are more
likely to receive positive coverage.