The student provides in-depth coverage of
discussion topic (s), outstanding clarity, and explanation of concepts
demonstrated in the information presented; approaches the weekly discussion
with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using clear and focused details.
The posting directly addresses key issues, questions, or problems related to
the topic of discussion. The posting applies course concepts with
|
examples learned |
the posting offers original and thoughtful insight,
synthesis, or observation that demonstrates a strong understanding of
the concepts and ideas pertaining to the discussion topic (use of examples).
The student’s initial thread response is rich in critical thinking and
full of thought, insight, and analysis;
The student uses a style and voice that are not
only appropriate to the given audience and purpose, but that also shows
originality and creativity. Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and
varied. Free of mechanical and typographical errors. A variety of sentence
structures are used. The student is clearly in command of standard, written,
academic English.
The student provides an explanation of how the
applicable Student Learning Outcomes were explored or related to the weekly
discussion topic.
robust support from credible, current (less than five years old), and relevant
scholarly references (at least two). The supporting evidence meets or exceeds
the minimum number of required scholarly references.
|
The student provides
|