Bmorales one is who recive high grade. Please editing and fixing my draft smilar to second one
What is the general consensus based on the 10-20 sources that you’ve read about why the US and UK have different relationships with China?
-
Because they have different political statuses (UK & US are democracy & China is communist), but the UK is more interested in their own policies, but the US is the hegemonic country and isn’t just concerned about treaties and economics but has larger worries.
-
US is concerned about human rights and Chinese aggressive foreign policy
The historical and hegemony issues cause the US would not have close relationship with China
As two major democracy countries, the U.S. and U.K. both need to stable cooperative relationships with China to achieve more mutual benefits, but they have completely different results.–The US’s status as global hegemon is the reason why the US & UK have different relations than China.
We have a couple of takeaways:
1) It’s a great insight to see that right now the abstract is making more of an observation than an argument, and you already told me how to make it more of an argument.
2) There’s another issue, and that is that the lit review’s subject is literature, and I don’t see a claim about the literature itself in the abstract.
Write down your claim about the literature here:
Main thesis for lit review The consensus of the literature is that The historical and hegemony issues cause the US would not have close relationship with China
Body would provide evidence that supports your claim:
-
You might have a paragraph about the literature that discusses history. For the history part, most of the literature talks about how the US had a close relationship with another democratic party in China in Taiwan, which is one of the main issues.
-
Literature talks about treaties and human rights
-
What does the literature think about comparing the US & UK?