make a concise argument that works toward a better understanding of the conflict between the competing perspectives involved in the protest (e.g., organizations, government officials, members of the public, etc.).

Engaging hook that prepares readers for the topic and argument.Clearly and concisely introduces the context of the protest. Provides a roadmap that tells readers the main points that will be addressed.Includes a clear, debatable, and compelling thesis statement that works toward a better understanding of competing perspectives involved in the protest.

Thoroughly and compellingly applies concepts and tactics from Unit 2 to better understand the conflict between competing perspectives involved in the protest. Analysis from Unit 1 is either cut or strategically woven into the new draft and demonstrates thorough engagement with the relationships between these rhetorical concepts.The number of concepts and tactics used is appropriate for the length of the paper and these concepts and tactics are thoroughly analyzed and developed.

(Use taxonomy of at least four (4) cultural logics around a dominant trope that you identify from your research on your protest using following the instructions for, tropes, agency and other rhetorical listening action to argue that the government should not have the power to make decisions regarding a women’s body”