{"id":9567,"date":"2023-03-17T13:46:44","date_gmt":"2023-03-17T13:46:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/compare-contrast-essay-comparative-analysis-on-something-that-has-happened-in-the-last-30-years\/"},"modified":"2023-03-17T13:46:44","modified_gmt":"2023-03-17T13:46:44","slug":"compare-contrast-essay-comparative-analysis-on-something-that-has-happened-in-the-last-30-years","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/compare-contrast-essay-comparative-analysis-on-something-that-has-happened-in-the-last-30-years\/","title":{"rendered":"compare contrast essay: comparative analysis on something that has happened in the last 30 years"},"content":{"rendered":"

Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/p>\n

For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis<\/div>\n
For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will:<\/div>\n
Choose a specific event or topic from the last 30 years that was the subject of substantive discourse; that is, something that was discussed, reported on, analyzed, and\/or recorded at length. You should choose something that may have been the subject of a debate, or that was subject to differing perspectives\/opinions. However, avoid anything prone to extreme controversy or potential misinformation\/disinformation.<\/div>\n
Find two \u201cpopular media\u201d articles (these can be from magazines, newspapers, or trade journals, and can be found either online or in print) or scholarly articles (i.e. sources from scholarly journals or books) that examine distinctly different stances or perspectives on your chosen event or topic. You want these articles to be persuasive rather than just informational, so look for texts that demonstrate an argument or idea they\u2019re trying to prove about your chosen subject. In finding your comparative sources, consider the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 The articles you choose should be substantial \u2014 a minimum of 800 words is ideal \u2014 and should present clear and thorough explorations of their chosen stances\/perspectives.<\/div>\n
\u2022 You should avoid choosing articles from the same outlet or two outlets that historically display the same perspectives (I.e. don\u2019t choose two articles from The Federalist and The New York Post as they often present very similar perspectives on most issues). You should use two outlets that have varied mission statements, and that generally present varied stances on the topic you\u2019re discussing.<\/div>\n
Once you have chosen two articles, you will build an analysis that examines the two articles side-by-side. Your goal is to identify the rhetorical strategies each article uses to make its points, and identify similarities and differences in your two sources\u2019 tactics for persuasion. To do this, you should highlight the following:<\/div>\n
\u2022 What point is each source trying to make? What information regarding the event\/topic is each source focusing on?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What types of evidence does each source present to support their side? Is it used appropriately?<\/div>\n
\u2022 What kinds of appeals does each source rely on? Are they used effectively?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source (or perhaps both) demonstrate any type of bias?<\/div>\n
\u2022 Does either source rely on fallacy to try to support its aims?<\/div>\n
Your goal for this essay is to arrive at some distinct conclusion about the event\/topic based on how they are discussed within your two sources, and why. This means you\u2019re seeking to determine what these two different perspectives can tell us about the subject at hand when we look at them together and seek common ground. Your thesis and overarching goals should focus on determining how rhetoric and\/or the information presented influence our (i.e. readers\u2019) understanding of the event\/topic. This can be tackled in a variety of ways, but you should strive to remain objective in your comparison.<\/div>\n
Technical Requirements<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should be in a typical college essay format (introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion).<\/div>\n
\u2022 Length: 3-5 pages (bottom of the third page minimum, not including Works Cited page) with a minimum of five (5) full paragraphs. It will probably require more than just five paragraphs.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Source utilization is required. You must use two (2) credible sources (the articles for comparison), but you may also use control factors if you wish (recommended maximum: 4 sources); direct evidence should be drawn from sources to support points (i.e. paraphrase and direct quotation). Be sure to include both MLA-compliant in-text citations and an MLA Works Cited page.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your essay should follow general MLA formatting rules; i.e. typed, double-spaced (no extra spacing between lines\/paragraphs), 12 pt. Times New Roman font throughout, 1-inch margins, with MLA front matter preceding the essay.<\/div>\n
\u2022 Your final version of this essay must be submitted digitally in either a Word document or a PDF file format.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Compare & Contrast Essay: Comparative Textual Analysis For your second major essay assignment in this class, your goal is to craft a comparative analysis of rhetoric employed in popular or scholarly discourse, and of similarities and differences in the presentation of information for specific aims. In order to do this, you will: Choose a specific […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[706],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/9567"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9567"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/9567\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9567"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=9567"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=9567"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=9567"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}