{"id":8464,"date":"2023-03-06T04:10:13","date_gmt":"2023-03-06T04:10:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/tlmt381-i001-winter-2030\/"},"modified":"2023-03-06T04:10:13","modified_gmt":"2023-03-06T04:10:13","slug":"tlmt381-i001-winter-2030","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/tlmt381-i001-winter-2030\/","title":{"rendered":"TLMT381 I001 Winter 2030"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n Learning Goal: <\/b>I’m working on a supply chain question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n <\/p>\n

Instructions:<\/strong><\/p>\n

In 2-3 pages, please review and do a full study. This assignment will come from chapter 2 on page 2.7. Review the case named “Electroplater Who Claims He Has No Hazardous Waste<\/strong>“. In this study, briefly evaluate the information and your evaluation of the case. In addition, research the Internet and locate an incident that has a related occurrence to this incident. Please discuss and describe the entire case. Be sure to correctly cite all information and in accordance with APA formatting.<\/p>\n

Submission Instructions:<\/strong> Please attach the assignment in Word Format. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
APUS Assignment Rubric Undergraduate Level<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

EXEMPLARY<\/strong><\/p>\n

LEVEL<\/strong><\/p>\n

4<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ACCOMPLISHED<\/strong><\/p>\n

LEVEL<\/strong><\/p>\n

3<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

DEVELOPING<\/strong><\/p>\n

LEVEL<\/strong><\/p>\n

2<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

BEGINNING<\/strong><\/p>\n

LEVEL<\/strong><\/p>\n

1<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
FOCUS\/THESIS<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent exhibits a clear understanding of the assignment. Work is clearly defined to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and\/or statements.<\/strong><\/td>\nEstablishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the formatting and grammar is not supported throughout the assignment. The reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. Student has limited the quality of the assignment.<\/strong><\/td>\nExhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Assignment instructions were not followed. Student\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements. Paper includes more than 25% quotes, which renders it unoriginal.<\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s current level of subject matter knowledge.<\/strong><\/td>\nThe assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.<\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CRITICAL THINKING<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for undergraduate level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and\/or world views in the assignment<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. However, student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent demonstrates beginning understanding of key concepts, but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills.<\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ORGANIZATION & FORMAT<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and\/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction, well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence. Student exhibits excellent format grasp with no more than 5 APA errors.<\/strong><\/td>\nStudent explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with a few formatting errors. Assignment contains less than 5 resources. Student exhibits good format grasp with no more than 10 APA errors.<\/strong><\/td>\nLearner applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing. Student uses less than 3 sources or references. Student exhibits fair format grasp with no more than 15 APA errors.<\/strong><\/td>\nAssignment reveals formatting errors and a lack of organization. Student presents an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key terms. The lack of appropriate references or source materials demonstrates the student\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s need for additional help or training in this area. Student needs to review and revise the assignment. Student exhibits poor format grasp with no more than 15 APA errors.<\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
GRAMMAR & MECHANICS<\/strong><\/td>\n <\/strong><\/td>\nStudent provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s ability to select appropriate word usage and present an above average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3-5 errors. Student provides a final written product that covers the above-minimal requirements. Student exhibits excellent format grasp with no more than 10 contents for grammar, spelling, punctuation, or syntax errors.<\/strong><\/td>\nAssignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but more than 5 errors. Key terms and concepts are somewhat vague and not completely explained by student. Student uses a basic vocabulary in assignment. Student\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s writing ability is average, but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter. Student exhibits fair format grasp with no more than 15 grammar, spelling, punctuation, or syntax errors.<\/strong><\/td>\nTopics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s writing style is weak and needs improvement, along with numerous proofreading errors. Assignment lacks clarity, consistency, and correctness. Student exhibits poor format grasp with more than 15 errors and did not focus critical thinking use of critical thinking grammar APA format subject knowledge with communities grammar, spelling, punctuation, or syntax errors.<\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nTurned in on time<\/strong><\/td>\n1 day late<\/strong><\/td>\n2 days late<\/strong><\/td>\nMore than 2 days late<\/strong><\/td>\n4<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total Points<\/strong><\/td>\n24\/ 24= 100%<\/strong><\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/d2l-html-block><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n