{"id":4914,"date":"2023-02-24T21:57:54","date_gmt":"2023-02-24T21:57:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/the-business-of-pop-culture\/"},"modified":"2023-02-24T21:57:54","modified_gmt":"2023-02-24T21:57:54","slug":"the-business-of-pop-culture","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/the-business-of-pop-culture\/","title":{"rendered":"The Business of Pop Culture"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"col-sm-12 messageContent\">\n <b>Learning Goal: <\/b>I&#8217;m working on a humanities writing question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn.<\/p>\n<h2>Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this.<\/h2>\n<h2>Instructions<\/h2>\n<h3>ANALYZE: ARTIFACT OF POPULAR CULTURE<\/h3>\n<h4>EVALUATION TITLE: THE BUSINESS OF POP CULTURE<\/h4>\n<p>We have seen throughout this course how popular culture influences our attitudes, both positively and negatively. In this final paper, you will examine an artifact in pop culture to determine its message and effect.<\/p>\n<p>For this assignment, select an artifact that, in your opinion, unfairly creates a negative bias or promotes a negative stereotype about one population of society. The pop culture artifact can be a media source (song, movie, television program), a product or other tangible associated with pop culture. Provide a link to this artifact (or an image). Explain why you have selected this artifact, and why you feel that this creates a negative bias. Describe how you would re-design or re-write the script of this artifact to change the way others would view this population.<\/p>\n<p><strong>In your paper:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Provide a specific link to pop culture artifact used for this paper or an image of the artifact.<\/li>\n<li>Discuss the artifact in depth. Explain the stereotypes or biases that you see being perpetuated in the artifact.<\/li>\n<li>Discuss the role of popular culture in communicating harmful or incorrect stereotypes or biases. Using the concepts, terminology, and ideas within Units 1-7, recommendations for how people can identify and correct views that are incorrect or harmful.<\/li>\n<li>Re-design or re-write this artifact to change the way others could view this population without the negative bias. Be sure to support this revised artifact with factual examples of the culture.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Specifications:<\/p>\n<p>Submit a 1200-1500 word essay Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages addressing the questions above.<\/p>\n<p>In your essay:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Be sure to structure your essay with an introduction paragraph that includes a thesis statement, well-organized supporting paragraphs, and a conclusion that reiterates the main points of your argument.<\/li>\n<li>Your argument should be supported by reputable research cited in APA format both in the body of the paper and in your references section.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Helpful Resources:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Herzing University\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Tutoring and Writing Center<\/li>\n<li>Grammar checker and writing help: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.grammarly.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"external\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/www.grammarly.com\/<span class=\"external_link_icon\"><br \/>\n     <svg viewbox=\"\">\n      <path><\/path>\n     <\/svg><span class=\"screenreader-only\">Links to an external site.<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li>Use the Herzing LIbrary to search for scholarly research sources.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Estimated time to complete: 4 hours<\/p>\n<h2>Rubric<\/h2>\n<p><span class=\"title\">Unit 7 Assessment &#8211; The Business of Pop Culture<\/span><\/p>\n<table class=\"rubric_table\">\n<caption>\n<p><span class=\"title\">Unit 7 Assessment &#8211; The Business of Pop Culture<\/span><\/p>\n<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Criteria<\/th>\n<th>Ratings<\/th>\n<th>Pts<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"outcome_sr_content\">This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><span class=\"description description_title\">Topic<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<table class=\"ratings\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">20<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 5<\/p>\n<p>Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">18<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 4<\/p>\n<p>Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">16<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 3<\/p>\n<p>Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">14<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 2<\/p>\n<p>Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">8<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 1<\/p>\n<p>Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">0<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 0<\/p>\n<p>Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"display_criterion_points\">20<\/span> pts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"outcome_sr_content\">This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><span class=\"description description_title\">Existing Knowledge, Research, and\/or Views<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<table class=\"ratings\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">20<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 5<\/p>\n<p>Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">18<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 4<\/p>\n<p>Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">16<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 3<\/p>\n<p>Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">14<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 2<\/p>\n<p>Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">12<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 1<\/p>\n<p>Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">0<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>0<\/p>\n<p>Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view\/approaches.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"display_criterion_points\">20<\/span> pts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"outcome_sr_content\">This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><span class=\"description description_title\">Content<\/span>HU340-CO1; HU340-CO2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<table class=\"ratings\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">20<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 5<\/p>\n<p>Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement\/thesis statement\/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">18<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 4<\/p>\n<p>Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement\/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">16<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 3<\/p>\n<p>Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement\/thesis statement\/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">14<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 2<\/p>\n<p>Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement\/thesis statement\/topic statement or related contextual factors.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">12<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 1<\/p>\n<p>Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">0<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 0<\/p>\n<p>There is no evidence of a defined statement.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"display_criterion_points\">20<\/span> pts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"outcome_sr_content\">This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><span class=\"description description_title\">Analysis<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<table class=\"ratings\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">20<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 5<\/p>\n<p>Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">18<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 4<\/p>\n<p>Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">16<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 3<\/p>\n<p>Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">14<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 2<\/p>\n<p>Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">12<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 1<\/p>\n<p>Describes evidence, but it is not organized and\/or is unrelated to focus.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">0<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 0<\/p>\n<p>Lists evidence, but it is not organized and\/or is unrelated to focus.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"display_criterion_points\">20<\/span> pts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"outcome_sr_content\">This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><span class=\"description description_title\">Conclusion<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<table class=\"ratings\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">15<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 5<\/p>\n<p>Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">14<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 4<\/p>\n<p>Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">12<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 3<\/p>\n<p>Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">11<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 2<\/p>\n<p>Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">9<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 1<\/p>\n<p>States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">0<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>0<\/p>\n<p>States an illogical conclusion from findings.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"display_criterion_points\">15<\/span> pts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"outcome_sr_content\">This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><span class=\"description description_title\">Limitations and Implications<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<table class=\"ratings\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">15<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 5<\/p>\n<p>Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">12<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 4<\/p>\n<p>Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">9<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 3<\/p>\n<p>Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">6<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 2<\/p>\n<p>Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">3<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 1<\/p>\n<p>Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">0<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>0<\/p>\n<p>Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"display_criterion_points\">15<\/span> pts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"outcome_sr_content\">This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><span class=\"description description_title\">Writing<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<table class=\"ratings\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">20<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 5<\/p>\n<p>The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">18<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 4<\/p>\n<p>The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">16<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 3<\/p>\n<p>The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">14<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 2<\/p>\n<p>The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">10<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 1<\/p>\n<p>The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">0<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 0<\/p>\n<p>The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"display_criterion_points\">20<\/span> pts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"outcome_sr_content\">This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><span class=\"description description_title\">APA<\/span>PRICE-I<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<table class=\"ratings\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">10<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 5<\/p>\n<p>The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">8<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 4<\/p>\n<p>The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">6<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 3<\/p>\n<p>The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">4<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 2<\/p>\n<p>The required APA elements are not all included and\/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">2<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 1<\/p>\n<p>Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">0<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Level 0<\/p>\n<p>There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and\/or there are no in-text citations and\/or references.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"display_criterion_points\">10<\/span> pts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">\n<p>Total Points: <span class=\"rubric_total\">140<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Requirements: 1200-1500 Words Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph<br \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions<br \/><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>No plagiarism &amp; No Course Hero &amp; No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Please be sure to use credible or scholarly sources<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Learning Goal: I&#8217;m working on a humanities writing question and need the explanation and answer to help me learn. Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. Instructions ANALYZE: ARTIFACT OF POPULAR CULTURE EVALUATION [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[736],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/4914"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4914"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/4914\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4914"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=4914"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=4914"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=4914"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}