{"id":34638,"date":"2023-09-26T18:42:09","date_gmt":"2023-09-26T18:42:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/book-critique-of-handle-with-care-managing-difficult-situations-in-schools-with-dignity-and-respect-by-jimmy-casas\/"},"modified":"2023-09-26T18:42:09","modified_gmt":"2023-09-26T18:42:09","slug":"book-critique-of-handle-with-care-managing-difficult-situations-in-schools-with-dignity-and-respect-by-jimmy-casas","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/book-critique-of-handle-with-care-managing-difficult-situations-in-schools-with-dignity-and-respect-by-jimmy-casas\/","title":{"rendered":"Book Critique of Handle with Care: Managing Difficult Situations in schools with Dignity and Respect By Jimmy Casas"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the first
\npart of the paper, describe <\/span>the main
\npoints of the book. Then analyze the contents of the book using material from
\nthe course. That <\/span>is,
\nif you agree with the book state why and support your position by
\nciting\/discussing content from the <\/span>course. (I agree with this book. Please write the critque from a positive point of view) Critique the book by describing its strengths and weaknesses. Finally, how will
\nyou use this <\/span>information to assist
\nyou when you are a principal? If the topic has not yet been covered in the
\ncourse, <\/span>you <\/span>are <\/span>encouraged <\/span>to <\/span>read <\/span>ahead <\/span>on <\/span>that <\/span>topic. <\/span>(10–<\/span>page <\/span>maximum <\/span>without cover page, assessment rubric,
\nand references)<\/b><\/p>\n

In addition, you
\nwill need to produce a single spaced 1-page abstract<\/u> of the book to be
\nposted within the <\/span>\u201cAssignments\u201d <\/span>area <\/span>under
\nSchool <\/span>Leadership <\/span>Book <\/span>Critique <\/span>Abstracts to share with the class.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Please use the following as sources:<\/p>\n

Handle with Care: Managing Difficult Situations in Schools with Dignity and Respect<\/p>\n

The principalship: New roles in a professional
\nlearning <\/span>community By: <\/span><\/i>Matthews, L. J. &
\nCrow, G. M. (2010).<\/span><\/p>\n

Covey, <\/span>S. <\/span>R. <\/span>(1990).
\n<\/span>Principle-centered <\/span>leadership<\/i>. <\/span><\/span>
<\/span><\/p>\n

Please use one more outside sorce the supports the ideas and the critique<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n


<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Please do not use Ai. The professor checks all papers for Ai plagarism. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n


<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

E<\/span><\/b>XEMPLARY<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

A<\/span><\/b>DEQUATE<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

N<\/span><\/b>OT <\/span><\/span><\/b>A<\/span><\/b>DEQUATE<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

U<\/span><\/b>NACCEPTABLE<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

25 <\/span>PTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

The main <\/span>points of the <\/span>book <\/span>described<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Main points are <\/span>clearly <\/span>articulated <\/span>and <\/span>understood<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Main points are
\n <\/span>noted but only <\/span>as stated in
\n the <\/span>book<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2-1 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Main points are
\n <\/span>briefly covered or <\/span>covered <\/span>in <\/span>a <\/span>confusing <\/span>manner.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Main points are
\n <\/span>not addressed.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

Main <\/span><\/b>points <\/span>analyzed<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6-5 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Main points are
\n <\/span>thoroughly <\/span>analyzed <\/span>using
\n <\/span>content from the <\/span>course
\n and <\/span>outside <\/span>sources.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Main points are
\n <\/span>analyzed using <\/span>content from <\/span>the <\/span>course.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3-1 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Main points are
\n <\/span>briefly analyzed with <\/span>a
\n weak connection <\/span>to the course <\/span>content.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Main points are
\n <\/span>not analyzed or <\/span>analyzed
\n only in a <\/span>cursory manner <\/span>and\/or no course <\/span>content<\/span><\/p>\n

connection<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Book <\/span>Critique<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6-5 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

In-depth <\/span>discussion
\n of the <\/span>strengths and <\/span>weaknesses <\/span>of<\/span><\/p>\n

the book <\/span>provided<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

The <\/span>critique <\/span>briefly
\n <\/span>addresses <\/span>the <\/span>strengths <\/span>and<\/span><\/p>\n

weaknesses of
\n <\/span>the <\/span>book<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3-1 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Strengths and <\/span>weaknesses <\/span>addressed but only <\/span>in a <\/span>cursory <\/span>manner.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Critique not <\/span>provided<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

How book <\/span>contents
\n <\/span>will <\/span>be <\/span>used <\/span>as
\n a <\/span>principal<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6-5 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Book <\/span>contents <\/span>are <\/span>applied <\/span>to <\/span>the
\n principalship <\/span>demonstrating a <\/span>thorough <\/span>understanding <\/span>and
\n synthesis of <\/span>the <\/span>main
\n <\/span>points.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Book contents <\/span>are <\/span>applied
\n <\/span>to <\/span>the <\/span>principalship in <\/span>a realistic <\/span>manner.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3-1 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Book <\/span>contents <\/span>are <\/span>weakly
\n applied to <\/span>the principalship in a <\/span>manner <\/span>that <\/span>does <\/span>not demonstrate <\/span>an <\/span>adequate <\/span>understanding.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Book contents are
\n <\/span>not <\/span>applied to <\/span>the
\n <\/span>principalship or <\/span>the content
\n is <\/span>misapplied <\/span>therefore <\/span>demonstrating <\/span>confusion <\/span>by <\/span>the<\/span><\/p>\n

student.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n

Mechanics<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

APA format is
\n <\/span>followed and <\/span>mechanical <\/span>errors do <\/span>not<\/span><\/p>\n

detract from <\/span>the
\n <\/span>paper.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2-1 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

APA format partially <\/span>followed <\/span>and\/or <\/span>there are numerous <\/span>mechanical <\/span>errors.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0 <\/span><\/span><\/b>POINTS<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Numerous <\/span>grammatical <\/span>and\/or spelling <\/span>errors and does <\/span>not <\/span>follow
\n <\/span>APA.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the first part of the paper, describe the main points of the book. Then analyze the contents of the book using material from the course. That is, if you agree with the book state why and support your position by citing\/discussing content from the course. (I agree with this book. Please write the critque […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[189],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/34638"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34638"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/34638\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=34638"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=34638"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=34638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}