{"id":33471,"date":"2023-09-11T19:10:40","date_gmt":"2023-09-11T19:10:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/careoregon-transforming-the-role-of-a-medicaid-health-plan-from-payer-to-partner\/"},"modified":"2023-09-11T19:10:40","modified_gmt":"2023-09-11T19:10:40","slug":"careoregon-transforming-the-role-of-a-medicaid-health-plan-from-payer-to-partner","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/careoregon-transforming-the-role-of-a-medicaid-health-plan-from-payer-to-partner\/","title":{"rendered":"CareOregon: Transforming the Role of a Medicaid Health Plan from Payer to Partner"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

case study evaluating Assignment Outline and Tasks<\/span>
I. Background \u2013 provide a brief yet well-rounded description of the organization under review (at the center of the case study)<\/span>
a. Include the target population for this organization (who does it service?)<\/span>
b. Include the key support this organization provides to the community or target<\/span>
population (what is the service?)<\/span>
II. Challenge \u2013 discuss the health and\/or healthcare delivery challenge experienced by the organization and\/or its community or target population (there might be more than one challenge \u2013 address at least one challenge)<\/span>
III. Perspective \u2013 explain how the challenge led to the development of a perspective (reason) for the redesign of the service\/s that would improve healthcare delivery and ultimately, the community\u2019s or target population\u2019s health; what is the perspective?<\/span>
IV. Data Supporting the Redesign \u2013 describe the data collected (internally and externally) as evidence of the challenge and to support the perspective for redesign<\/span>
V. Redesign & Model \u2013 discuss the model the organization employed to improve its service<\/span>
a. Include the vision for redesign<\/span>
b. Include how the model was applied<\/span>
VI. Redesign Tools \u2013 list at least three tools utilized in the redesign and provide a brief<\/span>
explanation of at least one<\/span>
VII. Metrics \u2013 Identify at least one performance metric and explain its purpose and how it was utilized<\/span>
VIII. Outcomes \u2013 discuss the outcomes of the redesign in relation to the challenge you have identified in the earlier part of this paper<\/span>
IX. Analysis and Recommendations \u2013 analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the redesign (e.g., what worked well and what could be better to obtain a greater benefit)<\/span>
a. Look at the lessons learned to assist your thought process<\/span>
b. Given their lessons learned, what would you recommend as an improvement<\/span>
strategy in the redesign? Suppose you had to implement a similar redesign, what<\/span>
would you do better?<\/span>
c. Discuss what level of government could be involved in this redesign and why.<\/span>
d. Explain how this redesign improves health services within the continuum of care.<\/span>
e. Briefly describe whether the redesign address acute care services or chronic care<\/span>
services or both.<\/span>
X. Conclusion<\/span>
<\/span><\/div>\n

Assessment Level Explanation<\/span>
CASE STUDY 1 ASSIGNMENT \u2013 HSCI 3201<\/span>

3-Proficient<\/span>
[Percent range: 93-100%]<\/span>
\u2022 Structure & organization: Expertly structured response with a high level of organization and coherence.<\/span>
\u2022 Addressing the task: Completely responds to the task.<\/span>
\u2022 Writing: Excellent grammar, spelling, and punctuation.<\/span>
\u2022 Argument\/analysis: Provides support for all<\/span>
ideas\/arguments\/analyses using credible explanations and sources.<\/span>
\u2022 Writing voice: Student\u2019s writing voice is strongly present, and all<\/span>
information is appropriately written in student\u2019s own words<\/span>
2-Competent<\/span>
[Percent range: 92-80%]<\/span>
\u2022 Structure & organization: Mostly well-structured response a good level of organization and coherence, yet inconsistent at times.<\/span>
\u2022 Addressing the task: Mostly responds to the task.<\/span>
\u2022 Writing:Few grammatical, spelling, and\/or punctuation errors.<\/span>
\u2022 Argument\/analysis: Most ideas\/arguments\/analyses are supported<\/span>
with credible explanations and sources.<\/span>
\u2022 Writing voice: Student\u2019s writing voice is present yet inconsistent with<\/span>
evidence of not fully using one\u2019s own words with minimal credit to sources.<\/span>
1-Novice<\/span>
[Percent range: 79-0%]<\/span>
\u2022 Structure & organization: Not well-structured response with little organization and coherence.<\/span>
\u2022 Addressing the task: Minimally responds to the task.<\/span>
\u2022 Writing: Many grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/span>
\u2022 Argument\/analysis: Most ideas\/arguments\/analysis are not<\/span>
supported with credible explanations and sources.<\/span>
\u2022 Writing voice: Student\u2019s writing voice is minimally present with<\/span>
evidence of using direct language from sources without use of quotation marks and\/or no credit given to the sources.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
The mission of The Commonwealth Fund is to promote a high performance health care system. The Fund carries out this mandate by supporting independent research on health care issues and making grants to improve health care practice and policy. Support for this research was provided by<\/span>
The Commonwealth Fund. The views presented here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of The Commonwealth Fund or its directors, officers, or staff.<\/span>
For more information about this study, please contact:<\/span>
Douglas McCarthy, M.B.A. Issues Research, Inc. <\/span><\/span>dmccarthy@issuesresearch.com<\/a>
To learn more about new publications when they become available, visit the Fund’s Web site and register to receive Fund email alerts.<\/span>
Commonwealth Fund pub. 1423 Vol. 50<\/span>
CareOregon: Transforming the Role of a Medicaid Health Plan from Payer to Partner<\/span>
<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
\n
\n

we have to read it and make a essay in APA style<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

following the below as an outline:I. Background \u2013 provide a brief yet well-rounded description of the organization under review (at the center of the case study)<\/span>
a. Include the target population for this organization (who does it service?)<\/span>
b. Include the key support this organization provides to the community or target<\/span>
population (what is the service?)<\/span>
II. Challenge \u2013 discuss the health and\/or healthcare delivery challenge experienced by the organization and\/or its community or target population (there might be more than one challenge \u2013 address at least one challenge)<\/span>
III. Perspective \u2013 explain how the challenge led to the development of a perspective (reason) for the redesign of the service\/s that would improve healthcare delivery and ultimately, the community\u2019s or target population\u2019s health; what is the perspective?<\/span>
IV. Data Supporting the Redesign \u2013 describe the data collected (internally and externally) as evidence of the challenge and to support the perspective for redesign<\/span>
V. Redesign & Model \u2013 discuss the model the organization employed to improve its service<\/span>
a. Include the vision for redesign<\/span>
b. Include how the model was applied<\/span>
VI. Redesign Tools \u2013 list at least three tools utilized in the redesign and provide a brief<\/span>
explanation of at least one<\/span>
VII. Metrics \u2013 Identify at least one performance metric and explain its purpose and how it was utilized<\/span>
VIII. Outcomes \u2013 discuss the outcomes of the redesign in relation to the challenge you have identified in the earlier part of this paper<\/span>
IX. Analysis and Recommendations \u2013 analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the redesign (e.g., what worked well and what could be better to obtain a greater benefit)<\/span>
a. Look at the lessons learned to assist your thought process<\/span>
b. Given their lessons learned, what would you recommend as an improvement<\/span>
strategy in the redesign? Suppose you had to implement a similar redesign, what<\/span>
would you do better?<\/span>
c. Discuss what level of government could be involved in this redesign and why.<\/span>
d. Explain how this redesign improves health services within the continuum of care.<\/span>
e. Briefly describe whether the redesign address acute care services or chronic care<\/span>
services or both.<\/span>
X. Conclusion \u2013 provide your own creative conclusion to wrap up your case response<\/span>
Noem\u00ed Rodr\u00edguez, January 2023<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
<\/span><\/div>\n


<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

case study evaluating Assignment Outline and TasksI. Background \u2013 provide a brief yet well-rounded description of the organization under review (at the center of the case study)a. Include the target population for this organization (who does it service?)b. Include the key support this organization provides to the community or targetpopulation (what is the service?)II. Challenge […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[1110],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/33471"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33471"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/33471\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=33471"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=33471"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=33471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}