{"id":32214,"date":"2023-08-23T13:57:56","date_gmt":"2023-08-23T13:57:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/how-do-socioeconomic-determinants-affect-health-parity-in-the-promotion-of-health-and-the-prevention-of-disease\/"},"modified":"2023-08-23T13:57:56","modified_gmt":"2023-08-23T13:57:56","slug":"how-do-socioeconomic-determinants-affect-health-parity-in-the-promotion-of-health-and-the-prevention-of-disease","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/how-do-socioeconomic-determinants-affect-health-parity-in-the-promotion-of-health-and-the-prevention-of-disease\/","title":{"rendered":"How do socioeconomic determinants affect health parity in the promotion of health and the prevention of disease?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
After completing the assigned readings for this module, please participate in the following discussion by addressing the following questions.<\/span><\/div>\n
1. How do socioeconomic determinants affect health parity in the promotion of health and the prevention of disease? <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
2. Discuss two factors which would help diverse populations to engage in health promotion behaviors. <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
3. Discuss a cultural and\/or historical factor that may impact health behaviors among a diverse population.<\/span><\/div>\n
4. What strategies can healthcare providers employ to promote health and prevent disease among diverse populations? Give specific examples.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
 <\/div>\n
Please make sure you fully address all compenents of the questions and provide scholarly sources to support your writing. For each of the discussions in this course, you have a discussion board rubric that identifies how your work will be graded. The rubric will specify required days of participation, number of discussion posts required, and the reference requirements. <\/span>This discussion is worth 75 points. Refer to the grading rubric by clicking the<\/span> <\/span>Settings <\/span><\/strong>icon located in the top right corner of the page and select the<\/span> <\/span>Show Rubric <\/span><\/strong>button.<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
NU 509 Discussion Rubric 2023<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
NU 509 Discussion Rubric 2023<\/span><\/div>\n<\/caption>\n
Criteria<\/th>\nRatings<\/th>\nPts<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\n
\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>Professionalism and Leadership<\/span><\/p>\n
Initial Primary Post<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

15<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

Excellent<\/div>\n
Posts initial primary post by the designated date on the discussion board schedule.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

0<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

Unsatisfactory<\/div>\n
Posts after the designated initial post due date on the discussion board schedule.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
\n
15<\/span> <\/span>pts
<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>Teamwork and Collaboration<\/span><\/p>\n
Interaction with Peers and Responses to Peers<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

22<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

Excellent<\/div>\n
Evidence of full engagement in the discussion. Posts in discussion on at least three different days. (One day for the primary post and at least two different days for peer responses.) Each peer response post demonstrates analysis of others posts and extends the discussion by building on previous posts and asking relevant questions, extends the discussion meaningfully Evidence\/research cited in at least 2 peer posts<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

11<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

Needs Improvement<\/div>\n
Only one substantive peer response The post demonstrates analysis of others posts and extends the discussion by building on previous posts and asking relevant questions, extends the discussion meaningfully Evidence\/research evident in only one peer response<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

0<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

Unsatisfactory<\/div>\n
Does not post in discussion on three different days or response to peers is simply \u201cI agree with your post\u201d or \u201cNice post\u201d Peer posts lack analysis and do not extend the discussion or build on previous posts No evidence of research in peer posts<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
\n
22<\/span> <\/span>pts
<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>Comprehension, Reasoning and Synthesis of Advanced Nursing Content Evidence-based Practice (EBP)<\/span><\/p>\n
Understanding and Using Course Content and EBP<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

30<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

Excellent<\/div>\n
The student understands significant ideas relevant to the issue or problem under discussion. This is indicated by correct use of terminology, precise selection of the pieces of information required to make a point, correct and appropriate use of examples and counterexamples, demonstrations of which distinctions are important to make, and explanations that are concise and to the point Information and knowledge are accurate The student elaborates statements with accurate explanations, reasons, and evidence Two or more appropriate scholarly sources effectively utilized in the primary post. (One source may be a textbook). No internet sources cited<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

15<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

Needs Improvement<\/div>\n
Ideas are reasonably clear, but the listener needs to make some guesses as to what the student meant Some correct terminology utilized but discussion is fragmented Some vocabulary is used correctly and some is not Ideas are correct but not concise. Information and knowledge somewhat accurate Contributions to the discussion are generally supported by some facts, examples, analogies, statistics, and so forth, but there\u2019s a sense that more is needed Evidence is only provided from the textbook. No scholarly peer reviewed journal articles cited or uses an internet source<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

0<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

Unsatisfactory<\/div>\n
The student uses foundational knowledge incorrectly or explore the problem\/issue thoroughly The student struggles to provide ideas or support for ideas Ideas are extremely limited or hard to understand The student has difficulty distinguishing main ideas and supporting details Terminology is used incorrectly. No citation of scholarly sources. Use of internet sources only<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
\n
30<\/span> <\/span>pts
<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span>Scholarly Writing<\/span><\/p>\n
Mechanics and APA<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

8<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

Excellent<\/div>\n
Writing has no spelling, grammatical, or APA errors, is organized, clear, and concise<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

4<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

Needs Improvement<\/div>\n
Writing has 1-4 spelling, grammatical, or APA errors, is organized, clear, and concise<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n

0<\/span> <\/span>pts<\/span><\/p>\n

Unsatisfactory<\/div>\n
Writing contains 5 or more spelling, grammatical, or APA errors<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n
\n
8<\/span> <\/span>pts
<\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
Total Points: <\/span>75<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

After completing the assigned readings for this module, please participate in the following discussion by addressing the following questions. 1. How do socioeconomic determinants affect health parity in the promotion of health and the prevention of disease?  2. Discuss two factors which would help diverse populations to engage in health promotion behaviors.  3. Discuss a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[190],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/32214"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32214"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/32214\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32214"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=32214"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=32214"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=32214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}