{"id":30478,"date":"2023-08-17T02:54:55","date_gmt":"2023-08-17T02:54:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/wrigley-continuity-chance-and-change-the-character-of-the-industrial-revolution-in-england\/"},"modified":"2023-08-17T02:54:55","modified_gmt":"2023-08-17T02:54:55","slug":"wrigley-continuity-chance-and-change-the-character-of-the-industrial-revolution-in-england","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/wrigley-continuity-chance-and-change-the-character-of-the-industrial-revolution-in-england\/","title":{"rendered":"Wrigley, Continuity, Chance and Change: The Character of the Industrial Revolution in England"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Review of book consists of two parts:<\/p>\n<p>At the top of the review part 1 and part 2, provide full title. For example, Geoff Mortimer, The Origins of the Thirty<br \/>\nYears War and the Revolt in Bohemia, 1618. New York, NY. Palgrave Macmillan. 2015. v + 293 pp.<\/p>\n<p>50% of Review consists of summary <\/p>\n<p>1. Description: Summarize the contents of the book. Pick out the most important points in<br \/>\nthe book. Read the book first and then summarize it.<\/p>\n<p>50% of Review consists of analysis.<br \/>\n2. Analysis:<br \/>\nNumber 1 to 10 and answer each point of analysis individually.<br \/>\nDo not merely report what the author says. In your own words, report the<br \/>\npoints you think the author is trying to make. This is the most important part of your<br \/>\nreview. Here you give your specific judgment about the extent to which the book was<br \/>\n&#8220;good&#8221; or &#8220;bad&#8221;. You need to cover the following points:<br \/>\n1. What is the author\u2019s argument? Provide two or three sentences.<br \/>\n2. How is the book organized?<br \/>\n3. What is the author&#8217;s purpose in writing the book?<br \/>\n4. What is the intended audience of the book?<br \/>\n5. Does the author cover all the points which you think should have been covered? Is<br \/>\nanything left out? Does anything not really fit?<br \/>\n6. Is the author biased for or against any particular view point?<br \/>\n7. Is the author easy to follow and understand? How effective is the author&#8217;s writing style?<br \/>\n8. Is the book effectively organized?<br \/>\n9. Was there a real need for this book?<br \/>\n10. How effectively does the author prove his argument? Pay particular attention to the<br \/>\nevidence the author uses to reach his conclusions. What kind of evidence is used? Is the<br \/>\nevidence appropriate? Is any possible evidence omitted?<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t be afraid to disagree with the author if there is anything about the book that you do not like<br \/>\nand indeed a good review will actively seek out parts of the book which could be improved.<br \/>\nAnd if you like the book, you should explain specifically why it was a good book, (and what<br \/>\nmistakes the author did not make). It&#8217;s not enough to say it&#8217;s a great book and that the author<br \/>\nreally knows his subject matter and that everyone should read it.<br \/>\nWhenever you make any kind of statement evaluating the book whether positive or negative, you<br \/>\nmust give specific evidence from the book demonstrating the validity of your claim.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Review of book consists of two parts: At the top of the review part 1 and part 2, provide full title. For example, Geoff Mortimer, The Origins of the Thirty Years War and the Revolt in Bohemia, 1618. New York, NY. Palgrave Macmillan. 2015. v + 293 pp. 50% of Review consists of summary 1. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[524],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/30478"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30478"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/30478\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=30478"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=30478"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=30478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}