{"id":29030,"date":"2023-08-13T22:38:24","date_gmt":"2023-08-13T22:38:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/week-5-discussion-1-state-and-federal-laws-on-competency-to-stand-trial-59-59-unread-replies-59-59-replies\/"},"modified":"2023-08-13T22:38:24","modified_gmt":"2023-08-13T22:38:24","slug":"week-5-discussion-1-state-and-federal-laws-on-competency-to-stand-trial-59-59-unread-replies-59-59-replies","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/week-5-discussion-1-state-and-federal-laws-on-competency-to-stand-trial-59-59-unread-replies-59-59-replies\/","title":{"rendered":"Week 5 Discussion 1: State and Federal Laws on Competency to Stand Trial 59 59 unread replies. 59 59 replies."},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Locate your state and federal laws that address competency to stand trial. Summarize your state standards for competency to stand trial, particularly the provisions for restoration of competency.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Summarize at least two cases regarding competency to stand trial. Here are some possible choices of case law:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 6px; margin-left: 25px; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">\n<li style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985).<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 (1981).<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Cooper v. Oklahoma, 517 U.S. 348 (1996).<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975).<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Dusky v. U.S., 362 U.S. 402 (1960).<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972).<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 1244 (1992).<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966).<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Riggins v. Nevada, 524 U.S. 127 (1992).<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003).<\/li>\n<li style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">(im in california by the way so use california please)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 style=\"padding: 30px 0px 0px; font-weight: 700; font-size: 24px; line-height: 30px; cursor: auto;\">Response Guidelines<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">In response to the posts of two other learners, discuss whether or not the laws of their states differ from those of your own state.<\/p>\n<p>reply to Vikram in a seperate paragraph please and thank you&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div>\n<article style=\"padding: 6px; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\" data-mark-read-url=\"\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">\n<div style=\"padding: 0px 10px 0px 15px; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\" data-bind=\"message\">\n<p style=\"margin: 8px 0px 12px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">West Virginia\u2019s law on competency to stand trial says within five days of an evaluator\u2019s report, the court can produce findings on if a defendant is able or unable to make their own decisions. If the defendant is incompetent, then in three months restoring the competency is possible if immediate intervention is needed. The client goes to a mental health facility and can be released from there as long as there\u2019s no danger to oneself and others. If a medical director evaluates the danger risk to be high, then it\u2019s justified to keep the person there for their own safety and others. Once competence is restored, then the defendant\u2019s attorney and hearing help with proceeding with a case. (West Virginia Code Chapter 27. Mentally Ill Persons \u00a7 27-6A-10).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Federal laws on this describe that the attorney general files motions for hearings. If defendants are believed to suffer from a disability, they can deem the person incompetent for the nature and effects. The person can go to a psychiatric facility if a psychiatric examination shows that the person is ready for trial. If a court finds that capacity is restored for competency, then proceedings can start. (FindLaw.com &#8211; 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 4241 &#8211; U.S. Code &#8211; Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure \u00a7 4241).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">One person was convicted of murder, and the state sought the death penalty. A psychiatric exam showed the respondent was competent to stand trial. A doctor who conducted the examination testified over the counsel\u2019s opposition that the person\u2019s name wasn\u2019t on the witness list. The pretrial examination showed the statement he gave was a danger to society. The death penalty was defeated based on the doctor\u2019s testimony. (<em style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Estelle v. Smith<\/em>, 1981).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">A petitioner named Cooper had the competency sometimes, pre-trial and in session for murder. The behavior and testimony were presented. The Court refuted the defense that competence was a burden. Therefore, the conclusion was that he was tested for the examination before sentencing. (<em style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Cooper v. Oklahoma<\/em>, 1996).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">References<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">1. FindLaw.com &#8211; West Virginia Code Chapter 27. Mentally Ill Persons \u00a7 27-6A-3. Competency of defendant to stand trial determination; \u2009preliminary finding; \u2009hearing; \u2009evidence; \u2009disposition &#8211;<em style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">last updated January 01, 2020<\/em><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span>|<span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><a style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">https:\/\/codes.findlaw.com\/wv\/chapter-27-mentally-ill-persons\/wv-code-sect-27-6a-3\/<\/span><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\"><span style=\"margin: -1px -1px 0px; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Links to an external site.<\/span><\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">2. FindLaw.com &#8211; 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 4241 &#8211; U.S. Code &#8211; Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure \u00a7 4241. Determination of mental competency to stand trial to undergo postrelease proceedings\u2009 1] &#8211;<span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><em style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">last updated January 01, 2018<\/em><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span>|<span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><a style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">https:\/\/codes.findlaw.com\/us\/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure\/18-usc-sect-4241.html<\/span><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\"><span style=\"margin: -1px -1px 0px; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Links to an external site.<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">3. Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 (1981).<span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><a style=\"cursor: auto;\"><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">https:\/\/supreme.justia.com<\/span><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\"><span style=\"margin: -1px -1px 0px; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Links to an external site.<\/span><\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">4. Cooper v. Oklahoma 517 U.S. 348 (1996). https:\/\/supreme.justia.com.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"padding: 10px 10px 10px 15px; font-size: 0.75rem; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">\n<div style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\" data-bind=\"notification\"><\/div>\n<p><a style=\"font-weight: 700; font-size: 16px; line-height: 18px; cursor: auto;\" data-event=\"addReply\"><i style=\"margin-top: -2px; line-height: 1; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\"><\/i><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n<div style=\"padding: 10px 10px 10px 15px; font-size: 0.75rem; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\"><a style=\"font-weight: 700; font-size: 16px; line-height: 18px; cursor: auto;\" data-event=\"addReply\"><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Also reply to Breana in a seperate paragraph please and thank you&nbsp;<\/span><\/a><span style=\"color: inherit; background-color: var(--color-6); font-size: 16px; font-variant-ligatures: inherit; font-variant-caps: inherit;\">My state is Nebraska and the competency to stand trial laws follow the usual guidelines and regulations. Nebraska states that at any time either before or during the trail it appears that the defendant is not competent to stand trial any person for the defendant may call this to the court\u2019s attention, including attorneys of the court (Nebraska Legislature, 2023). If the defendant is deemed incompetent to stand trial, and there\u2019s potential to be deemed competent at some point in the future, the judge shall commit the defendant to treatment to restore competency (Nebraska Legislature, 2023). About 20 days after this decision is made there will be a court hearing held on if the treatment is appropriate or not (Nebraska Legislature, 2023). Every 60 days the court will have a hearing to determine if the defendant has competency restored or if treatment is still appropriate (Nebraska Legislature, 2023). If the defendant is deemed to never have competency restored, then the court can either commit the defendant indefinitely or release them (Nebraska Legislature, 2023). If the defendant is deemed to never have competency restored, then the charges against them can be discharged or dismissed (Nebraska Legislature, 2023). Any examinations done to determine if the defendant is competent or not must follow all ethical rules, regulations, and guidelines (Nebraska Legislature, 2023). Any professional who is performing examinations will be paid an amount deemed fair by the court (Nebraska Legislature, 2023).<\/span><\/div>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\"><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span>The first case I looked into was Riggins v. Nevada, 524 U.S. 127 (1992). In this supreme court case, the court decided on whether a court could force a mentally ill individual to take antipsychotic medication while they are on trial to keep them competent during trial. David Riggins was charged with arrested and charged with capital murder and robbery an individual who was found stabbed to death (Wikipedia, 2023). After he was arrested, he admitted to hearing voices and having sleeplessness (Wikipedia, 2023). He told the jail psychiatrist that he had previously be on an antipsychotic medication before and the psychiatrist prescribed it to him, he was taking 800 MG of Mellaril a day (Wikipedia, 2023). Riggins was evaluated and deemed competent to stand trial. Riggins planned to present an insanity defense and requested to stop taking his medication until after the trail so the judge could see an honest first-hand experience of his mental state on the night of the crime (Wikipedia, 2023). However, the courts denied this request and required that Riggins stay on his medication (Wikipedia, 2023). The jury found Riggins guilty of murder and robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced him to death (Wikipedia, 2023). Riggins appealed claiming that being forced to take his medication is against his sixth and fourteenth amendment rights. The supreme court ruled that forced administration of antipsychotic medication violated Riggins\u2019s due process rights held by the sixth and fourteenth amendments (Wikipedia, 2023).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\"><span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/span>The second case I took a deeper dive into is Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). In this supreme court case, the court decided that a state must provide a psychiatric evaluation to criminal offenders who need it but lack the finical resources for one (Wikipedia, 2019). Glen Burton Ake was arrested and charged with first degree murder of a couple and wounding their children (Wikipedia, 2019). At his arrangement he was deemed incompetent to stand trial and was even diagnosed with probable paranoid schizophrenia (Wikipedia, 2019). He was committed to a state hospital for several months receiving treatment to restore competency. After this Ake had his trial, where his attorney requested that the court appoint a psychiatrist to evaluate and aid in preparing an insanity defense for Ake (Wikipedia, 2019). The court refused stating that Ake had no right to such assistance. Ake was found guilty of two counts of first-degree murder and was sentenced to death (Wikipedia, 2019). Ake appealed this decision and the court ruled in favor of Ake (Wikipedia, 2019). Due to Ake\u2019s due process rights the state must provide him with an appointed psychiatrist if he can\u2019t afford his own (Wikipedia, 2019).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">References:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Nebraska Legislature. (2023).<span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><em style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Nebraska legislature<\/em>. The official site of the Nebraska Unicameral Legislature. https:\/\/nebraskalegislature.gov\/laws\/statutes.php?statute=29-1823<span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 12px 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Wikipedia. (2023, July 10).<span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><em style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Riggins v. Nevada<\/em>. Wikipedia Foundation. https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Riggins_v._Nevada#:~:text=Nevada%2C%20504%20U.S.%20127%20(1992,remain%20competent%20during%20the%20trial.<span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.625; cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Wikipedia. (2019, April 29).<span style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><em style=\"cursor: auto; color: inherit;\">Ake v. Oklahoma<\/em>. Wikipedia Foundation. https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ake_v._Oklahoma<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Locate your state and federal laws that address competency to stand trial. Summarize your state standards for competency to stand trial, particularly the provisions for restoration of competency. Summarize at least two cases regarding competency to stand trial. Here are some possible choices of case law: Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985). Estelle v. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[196],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/29030"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29030"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/29030\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=29030"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=29030"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=29030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}