{"id":2807,"date":"2023-02-19T20:22:19","date_gmt":"2023-02-19T20:22:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/writing-eng\/"},"modified":"2023-02-19T20:22:19","modified_gmt":"2023-02-19T20:22:19","slug":"writing-eng","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/writing-eng\/","title":{"rendered":"writing eng"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"col-sm-12 messageContent\"><b>Learning Goal: <\/b>I&#8217;m working on a english discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.<\/p>\n<p>Assignment due by Sunday @11:59 pm<\/p>\n<p><strong>Using Microsoft Word document and or Google docs select one question and conduct a critical analysis of the question: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This assignment aligns with the learning objective that pertains to the different types of sentences and sanctions that comprise the correctional system. It further aligns the offender-based characteristics that are used to determine placement in the correctional system.<\/p>\n<p>You may complete the assignment in teams of two. ( Optional)<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span class=\"instructure_file_holder link_holder instructure_file_link_holder ally-file-link-holder\"><a class=\"auto_open file_preview_link previewable\" title=\"The People v Chaz Pride.pdf\" href=\"https:\/\/gcccd.instructure.com\/courses\/49705\/files\/8047777\/download?wrap=1\" data-api-endpoint=\"https:\/\/gcccd.instructure.com\/api\/v1\/courses\/43294\/files\/6227472\" data-api-returntype=\"File\" aria-expanded=\"true\" aria-controls=\"preview_1\" data-id=\"8047777\">The People v Chaz Nasjhee Pride<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/gcccd.instructure.com\/courses\/49705\/assignments\/1307201?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgcccd.instructure.com%2Fcalendar%23view_name%3Dmonth%26view_start%3D2023-02-19#\" role=\"button\" tabindex=\"0\" class=\"al-trigger\"><img src=\"https:\/\/gcccd.instructure.com\/images\/svg-icons\/svg_icon_download.svg\" alt=\"\"><span class=\"screenreader-only\">Actions<\/span><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/gcccd.instructure.com\/courses\/49705\/assignments\/1307201?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fgcccd.instructure.com%2Fcalendar%23view_name%3Dmonth%26view_start%3D2023-02-19#\" class=\"hide_file_preview_link\">Minimize File Preview<\/a><iframe src=\"https:\/\/gcccd.instructure.com\/api\/v1\/canvadoc_session?blob=%7B%22user_id%22:89400000000015042,%22attachment_id%22:8047777,%22type%22:%22canvadoc%22%7D&amp;hmac=b623329d8c431bee9173b9260707824c439dee50\" width=\"100%\" allowfullscreen=\"1\" id=\"undefined\" style=\"border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; max-width: 100%; overflow: auto; height: 800px; min-height: 800px;\"><\/iframe><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>TASKS<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Summarize<\/strong> your understanding of the facts of the case.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Review<\/strong> the <a class=\"instructure_file_link inline_disabled external\" href=\"https:\/\/leginfo.legislature.ca.gov\/faces\/codesTOCSelected.xhtml?tocCode=PEN\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">California Legislative Information(link) <span class=\"external_link_icon\"><br \/>\n     <svg viewbox=\"\">\n      <path><\/path>\n     <\/svg><span class=\"screenreader-only\">Links to an external site.<\/span><\/span><\/a>to obtain the sentencing information for your case. (FYI-it also noted in the appellate packet). In your search of the Penal Code, what is the noted sentence for the criminal case?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Respond (Q): <\/strong> Should offenders convicted of certain crimes only be punished by confinement? <strong>Explain<\/strong> your rationale? Consider the underlying indictment (charges) when considering the types of punishment that should be imposed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>General Guidelines for the assignment<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p>Since you are the future leaders of tomorrow, the questions are meant to invoke your critical thinking skills. Be sure to submit a substantive response to earn maximum points. Start with an introductory paragraph to give the reader a clear picture of the topic. Assume that the reader has no knowledge of the subject matter and that you are being tasked with explaining the concepts. Subsequent paragraphs should support your topic with researched information from your textbook, outside resources, and your independent assessment. Be sure to end with a concluding paragraph and cite your sources.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Grading Rubric can be accessed below the text box.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2>Rubric<\/h2>\n<p><span class=\"title\">Rubric: Chapter Review Assignment (6) (4)<\/span><\/p>\n<table class=\"rubric_table\">\n<caption>\n<p><span class=\"title\">Rubric: Chapter Review Assignment (6) (4)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Criteria<\/th>\n<th>Ratings<\/th>\n<th>Pts<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"outcome_sr_content\"><span class=\"screenreader-only\">This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span><span class=\"description description_title\">Content\/Conceptualization<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<table class=\"ratings\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">6<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Response displays a full understanding of the complexity of the issue addressed and multiple points of view. Recognizes varied interpretations and implications. excellent exposition, clearly and concisely written, well argued, and displaying good original input from the student.<\/p>\n<p>Author directly addresses main question or issue, and adds new insight to the subject not provided in lectures, readings, or class discussions. The author has retained nearly all of the knowledge presented in class. He\/She is able to synthesize this knowledge in new ways and relate to material not covered in the course. Provides compelling and accurate evidence that convinces reader to accept main argument. The importance\/relevance of all pieces of evidence is clearly stated. There are no gaps in reasoning\u2014i.e., the reader does not need to assume anything or do additional research to accept main argument. Conclusion-Elegantly synthesizes and reframes key points from the paper. Suggests new perspectives or questions relevant to the central argument, and brings closure<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">5<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Good exposition, but lacks clarity and concision, or doesn\u2019t have much original input, or offers poor support for important claims.<\/p>\n<p>Author competently addresses main question or issue, but does not add much new insight into the subject. That said, it is clear that the author has learned a great deal in class and is able to communicate this knowledge to others. Provides necessary evidence to convince reader of most aspects of the main argument but not all. The importance\/ relevance of some evidence presented may not be totally clear. Reader must make a few mental leaps or do some additional research to fully accept all aspects of main argument. Conclusion-Synthesizes and brings closure but does not examine new perspectives or questions<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">4<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No Description<\/p>\n<p>Response does not address some aspects of the assignment. (and\/or\u2026) Response demonstrates a somewhat shaky grasp of criminological principles. The response represents the authors\u2019 arguments, evidence and conclusions accurately though not sufficiently clearly. (and\/or\u2026) Conclusion-Restates the same points as the topic paragraph without reframing them. (and\/or\u2026) Introduces new material rather than new perspectives.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">3<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No Description<\/p>\n<p>Author attempts to address main question or issue, but fails. The author has retained some information from the course, but does not fully understand its meaning or context and cannot clearly convey it to others. Not enough evidence is provided to support author\u2019s argument, or evidence is incomplete, incorrect, or oversimplified. Information from lectures and readings is not effectively used. Conclusion-Is missing or cursory. (and\/or\u2026) Repeats the topic paragraph more-or-less verbatim.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">2<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No Description<\/p>\n<p>Fails to understand some aspects of the material, and\/or is very unclearly written. Main points lack detailed development. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking. Shows some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are underdeveloped and unoriginal.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">1<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No Description<\/p>\n<p>Response does not address the assignment. Fails to follow format and assignment requirements; incorrect margins, spacing and indentation; neatness of essay needs attention.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">0<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Did not submit a paper; plagiarized material; made no effort to understand the material or shows no sign of having read it.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"display_criterion_points\">6<\/span> pts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"outcome_sr_content\"><span class=\"screenreader-only\">This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span><span class=\"description description_title\">Organization\/Structure\/Mechanics<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<table class=\"ratings\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">2<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Full Marks<\/p>\n<p>Essay contains an intro, main body, and conclusion. Introduction lays out main argument and gives an outline of what the reader can expect in the essay. The conclusion brings everything together, acknowledges potential shortcomings of the paper, and gives the reader a sense of what further work might be done to advance the subject matter described in the paper.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">1<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No Description<\/p>\n<p>The introduction gives the reader an idea of what to expect in the paper, but does not effectively lay out the main argument. It may begin with a set of rhetorical questions, or an anecdote that is never fully explained. The conclusion does little more than restate the problematic introduction. Intro and\/or conclusion may be too wordy or short.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">0<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No Marks<\/p>\n<p>Essay has no clear organizational pattern.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"display_criterion_points\">2<\/span> pts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"outcome_sr_content\"><span class=\"screenreader-only\">This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome<\/span><\/span><span class=\"description description_title\">Spelling\/Grammar\/APA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<table class=\"ratings\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">2<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Full Marks<\/p>\n<p>All sentences are grammatically correct and clearly written. No words are misused or unnecessarily fancy. Technical terms, words from other languages, and words from other historical periods are always explained. All information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has been spell-checked AND proofread (ideally by you and somebody else), and contains no errors<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">1<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No Description<\/p>\n<p>A few sentences are grammatically incorrect or not clearly written. Several words are misused. Technical terms, words from other languages, and words from other historical periods are rarely explained. Not all information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has been spell-checked AND proofread, but still contains several errors. Reader\u2019s ability to understand essay may be compromised by these errors.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><span class=\"nobr toggle_for_hide_points \"><span class=\"points\">0<\/span> pts<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No Marks<\/p>\n<p>Paper is full of grammatical errors and bad writing. Several words are misused. Technical terms, words from other languages, and words from other historical periods are rarely explained. Not all information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has not been spell-checked or proofread, and contains numerous errors. Reader has a difficult time understanding essay because of errors.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p><span class=\"display_criterion_points\">2<\/span> pts<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"4\">\n<p>Total Points: <span class=\"rubric_total\">10<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><span class=\"module-sequence-footer-button--previous\"><a href=\"https:\/\/gcccd.instructure.com\/courses\/49705\/modules\/items\/3080809\" role=\"button\" class=\"Button\" aria-describedby=\"msf0-previous-desc\" aria-label=\"Previous Module Item\">Previous<\/a><\/span><span class=\"module-sequence-footer-button--next\"><a href=\"https:\/\/gcccd.instructure.com\/courses\/49705\/modules\/items\/3080811\" role=\"button\" class=\"Button\" aria-describedby=\"msf0-next-desc\" aria-label=\"Next Module Item\">Next<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Learning Goal: I&#8217;m working on a english discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn. Assignment due by Sunday @11:59 pm Using Microsoft Word document and or Google docs select one question and conduct a critical analysis of the question: This assignment aligns with the learning objective that pertains to the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[186],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/2807"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2807"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/2807\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=2807"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=2807"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=2807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}