The first portion of your assessment requires you to evaluate the The matrix is a synthesis, not a summary. A synthesis requires <\/p>\n Part 1: Scenario Synthesis The first portion of your assessment requires you to evaluate the following four scenario frameworks by critically assessing their main ideas or constructs and synthesizing the research findings. You will evaluate the research of Day & Schoemaker (2005), Godet & Roubelat (1996), Hussain et al. (2017), and Ramirez et al. (2017) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[1112],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/24612"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24612"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/24612\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=24612"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=24612"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=24612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nfollowing four scenario frameworks by critically assessing their main
\nideas or constructs and synthesizing the research findings. You will
\nevaluate the research of Day & Schoemaker (2005), Godet &
\nRoubelat (1996), Hussain et al. (2017), and Ramirez et al. (2017) using
\nthe Scenario Synthesis Matrix (Table 1) section of the Scenario and Alternative Futures Template [DOCX]<\/a>.
\n Remember, as in all of the course assessments, all supplied and
\nresearched articles should be entered into your Capstone Literature
\nMatrix.<\/p>\n\n
\nmanagers to be more cognizant of the external environment and status of
\ntheir company. Scenarios can be of three major categories: (1)
\nexploratory, starting from past trends leading to a likely future; (2)
\nanticipatory or plausible built on different definitions of the future,
\ndesired or feared (the Oxford method); and (3) probabilistic stance
\n(best case\/worst case) (Godet & Roubelat, 1996; Ramirez et al.
\n(2017).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\ndifferent main points or arguments presented by the authors from each of
\n the scenario articles on their respective scenario frameworks. Complete
\n the following steps:<\/p>\n\n
\narticle relate to the main points identified? Note: some articles may
\nnot cover all of the main ideas listed. Leave the field blank if the
\narticle does not address that main point.<\/li>\n
\nfollowed. The matrix itself will be followed by a written summation of
\nyour findings on scenario constructs and frameworks and their
\napplication.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"