This order is a rewrite and most of the work has already been presented to my supervisors over a period of ttime.<\/p>\n
Thesis \u2013 On the job and beyond: Whose anxiety is it anyway? <\/span><\/p>\n Thanks Main changes<\/span><\/p>\n 1. In your findings chapter you need to present and describe the main findings from your study<\/span><\/p>\n 2. Present key findings as a collective rather then presenting data from each individuals – it appears most of your participants were in agreement and\/or said the same things<\/p>\n 3. Only present individual participants where there are different interpretations\/opinions of these findings or where their <\/p>\n You do not need to interpret the findings at this point, you <\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n This order is a rewrite and most of the work has already been presented to my supervisors over a period of ttime. Thesis \u2013 On the job and beyond: Whose anxiety is it anyway? Experiences of CQC inspections for registered managers. An exploratory study on the impact of Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspections on Registered […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[852],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/21093"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21093"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/21093\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21093"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=21093"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=21093"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=21093"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nExperiences of CQC inspections for registered managers. An exploratory study on
\nthe impact of Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspections on Registered Manager\u2019s
\nworking in adult Mental Health Care Homes.<\/u><\/span><\/p>\n
\nfor sending us the introduction to your findings chapter. In doing some more
\nwork on this chapter, it is important that you take account of the following
\ncomments:<\/span><\/p>\n
<\/span><\/p>\n
\nperceptions differ from others<\/span><\/p>\n
\nonly need to tell us what you discovered during the process of analysing your
\ndata. What you choose to include should mainly be those findings which are
\nrelevant to your research aims and your research questions, and which help us
\nunderstand your choice of title for your thesis. However, given the
\ncircumstances in which you undertook your study, ie the pandemic, you will need
\nto include findings that relate to the impact of covid. But this is only a
\nslight deviation, as it closely relates to the lived experience of the RMs, the
\ncomplexity of their role and their anxiety, as well as the impact of
\ninspections. You can also include other findings that you think are interesting
\nand significant, but you will need to explain why they are being included.<\/span><\/p>\n
\nIn the introduction to your findings chapter, it is good to remind the reader
\nof what you set out to do in your study. You\u2019ve done that to some extent in 4.2
\nof what you\u2019ve sent us, but that needs to be where the chapter starts. Taking
\naccount of the title and aims, what is the argument that drives your thesis?
\nAnother way of putting this might be to say what point did you hope your study
\nwould make? This could also be part of your introduction. In order to help make
\nyour case, you have a primary question and you have secondary questions. State
\nwhat they are again. Next, as part of the introduction, outline the structure
\nof the chapter ie what do you plan to include? How do you intend to approach
\nthe findings?
\n
\nIt will be hard to do this without first identifying what you think are the
\nmain findings in relation to each research question. Then, consider what are
\nthe main themes arising from those findings. Structuring your findings
\naccording to the themes and relating the themes to each of your questions can
\nbe an effective way of presenting your findings.
\n
\nFirst of all, we need to know about the lived experience of the RMs. So what
\ndid they tell you about their perception of the job? Don\u2019t forget your title –
\n\u2018On the job and beyond\u2019. What did they say about work\/life balance and the job
\nspilling over?
\n
\nWhatever way you decide to present your findings, you need to use quotes from
\nyour participants as evidence to support your findings. As it\u2019s not realistic,
\nin view of the word count, to include quotes from everyone you need to select
\nwhat is most representative of the themes and points you want to make. Name the
\nparticipants when doing this and comment on who else holds the same views and
\nwhose views may be different. Where there may be differences of opinion, quote
\nthem too. In this way, you will hopefully begin to build up a picture that
\nhelps readers understand what it\u2019s like to be an RM. You can then move on to
\nwrite about their perception of the way inspections impact on them.
\n
\nWhat you\u2019ve shared with us contains a lot of ideas that you have presented in a
\ncreative way through the use of diagrams and tables. However, diagrams fit more
\nappropriately in the discussion chapter where you have the freedom to think
\nbroadly about your role and experience, and how that connects to your
\nfindings, literature review and theory. In the findings chapter, you need to
\npresent your key findings in a narrative form, a bit like telling a story. It needs
\nto be coherent and it needs to flow logically. <\/span>If
\ninspections stays the main question, the presentation of your findings needs to
\nmake sure it comes across like that, and you need to make a case for it
\nremaining the central element of your thesis.<\/span><\/p>\n
\nWhen we meet on Monday it would be good if you could take us through the main
\nfindings in relation to your questions. This is something that you will also
\nneed to do for your supervisory panel review at the end of next week.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n