{"id":20720,"date":"2023-05-24T02:04:32","date_gmt":"2023-05-24T02:04:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/presentation-critical-review-evaluation-of-health-promotion-protocol-practice\/"},"modified":"2023-05-24T02:04:32","modified_gmt":"2023-05-24T02:04:32","slug":"presentation-critical-review-evaluation-of-health-promotion-protocol-practice","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/presentation-critical-review-evaluation-of-health-promotion-protocol-practice\/","title":{"rendered":"Presentation: Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol\/Practice"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
<\/p>\n
\n

The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health.<\/p>\n

Your presentation should<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

1. Identify and select a screening tool  <\/span>
2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol\/practice. 
3. Provide recommendations.

<\/p>\n

Submission Instructions:
<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  • Presentation is original work and logically organized in the current <\/span><\/span>APA style including citation of references.<\/span><\/li>\n
  • Incorporate a minimum of 4 <\/span>current (published within the last five years) <\/span>scholarly journal articles<\/em> or primary legal sources<\/em> (statutes, court opinions) within your work. <\/span><\/li>\n
  • PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.<\/span><\/li>\n
  • The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.<\/span><\/li>\n
  • Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.<\/span><\/li>\n
  • Complete and submit by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n



    <\/p>\n

    Grading Rubric<\/strong> <\/p>\n

    \n

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    \n
    \n
    <\/span>View Rubric<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n
    \n
    \n
    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Presentation Rubric<\/span><\/caption>\n
    <\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
    Presentation Rubric<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
    Criteria<\/th>\nRatings<\/th>\nPts<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    \n
    Identification of Main Issues\/Problems<\/span><\/div>\n
    view longer description<\/span><\/div>\n<\/th>\n
    		\n
    <\/p>\n
    \n
    4 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Distinguished<\/span><\/div>\n

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues\/problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    3 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Excellent<\/span><\/div>\n

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues\/problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    2 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Fair<\/span><\/div>\n

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues\/problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    1 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Poor<\/span><\/div>\n

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues\/problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    0 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    No Submission<\/span><\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n
    \/ 4 pts<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \n
    Analysis and Evaluation of Issues\/Probelms<\/span><\/div>\n
    view longer description<\/span><\/div>\n<\/th>\n
    		\n
    <\/p>\n
    \n
    4 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Distinguished<\/span><\/div>\n

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues\/problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    3 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Excellent<\/span><\/div>\n

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues\/problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    2 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Fair<\/span><\/div>\n

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues\/problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    1 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Poor<\/span><\/div>\n

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues\/problems.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    0 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    No Submission<\/span><\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n
    \/ 4 pts<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \n
    Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding<\/span><\/div>\n
    view longer description<\/span><\/div>\n<\/th>\n
    		\n
    <\/p>\n
    \n
    4 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Distinguished<\/span><\/div>\n

    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues\/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    3 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Excellent<\/span><\/div>\n

    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues\/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    2 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Fair<\/span><\/div>\n

    Provides a competent responses to all issues\/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    1 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Poor<\/span><\/div>\n

    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues\/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    0 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    No Submission<\/span><\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n
    \/ 4 pts<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \n
    Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research\/Literature<\/span><\/div>\n
    view longer description<\/span><\/div>\n<\/th>\n
    		\n
    <\/p>\n
    \n
    4 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Distinguished<\/span><\/div>\n

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    3 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Excellent<\/span><\/div>\n

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    2 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Fair<\/span><\/div>\n

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    1 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Poor<\/span><\/div>\n

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    0 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    No Submission<\/span><\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n
    \/ 4 pts<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \n
    Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines<\/span><\/div>\n
    view longer description<\/span><\/div>\n<\/th>\n
    		\n
    <\/p>\n
    \n
    4 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Distinguished<\/span><\/div>\n

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    3 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Excellent<\/span><\/div>\n

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    2 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Fair<\/span><\/div>\n

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    1 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    Poor<\/span><\/div>\n

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.<\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
    0 pts<\/span><\/div>\n
    No Submission<\/span><\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/p>\n

    <\/div>\n
    \n
    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    <\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/td>\n

    		\n
    \/ 4 pts<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Total Points: 0<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health. Your presentation should: 1. Identify and select a screening tool  2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol\/practice. 3. Provide recommendations. Submission […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[190],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/20720"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/20720\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=20720"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=20720"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=20720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}