{"id":17244,"date":"2023-04-25T22:37:34","date_gmt":"2023-04-25T22:37:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/picot-in-adolescents-between-the-ages-16-20-p-how-does-social-media-usage-i-affect-the-amount-of-risky-sexual-behaviors-o-compared-to-those-who-do-not-use-social-media-c-over-12-months-t\/"},"modified":"2023-04-25T22:37:34","modified_gmt":"2023-04-25T22:37:34","slug":"picot-in-adolescents-between-the-ages-16-20-p-how-does-social-media-usage-i-affect-the-amount-of-risky-sexual-behaviors-o-compared-to-those-who-do-not-use-social-media-c-over-12-months-t","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/picot-in-adolescents-between-the-ages-16-20-p-how-does-social-media-usage-i-affect-the-amount-of-risky-sexual-behaviors-o-compared-to-those-who-do-not-use-social-media-c-over-12-months-t\/","title":{"rendered":"PICOT: In adolescents between the ages 16-20 (P), how does social media usage (I) affect the amount of risky sexual behaviors (O) compared to those who do not use social media (C) over 12 months (T)?"},"content":{"rendered":"
I have included the instructions as well as the rubric for this midterm paper. I have included both annotated bibliography(AB) 1 and 2 for your references, however AB 1 was found to have non relevant sources for the assignment so you will need to find add’l sources. The sources should be PRIMARY sources only, so no meta analysis are allowed. I will also be attaching seperate files with instrctions on things that were found to be wrong with each AB so that it can be corrected for the term paper. Please let me know if you have any questions about this assignment.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

This mini-literature review should be in APA 7th edition student paper format. It should be approximately 6-8 pages in length (excluding cover page and reference list). It should reflect a synthesis of your findings from the two annotated bibliographies and propose a study to address the gap in the literature. See rubric for additional detail. This mini-literature review should be in APA 7th edition student paper format. It should be approximately 6-8 pages in length (excluding cover page and reference list). It should reflect a synthesis of your findings from the two annotated bibliographies and propose a study to address the gap in the literature. See rubric for additional detail. <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
Paper Rubric<\/div>\n
Criteria\tRatings\tPts<\/div>\n
Purpose\/Problem Statement<\/div>\n
10 to >8 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Identifies a relevant research topic and a thesis that provides direction for the paper that is engaging and thought provoking, The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the paper.<\/div>\n
8 to >6 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Identifies a relevant research topic and a thesis that provides adequate direction for the paper with some degree of interest for the reader. The thesis states the position, premise, or hypothesis, and is the focal point of the paper for the most part.<\/div>\n
6 to >3 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Identifies a research topic but may be too broad in scope and\/or the thesis is somewhat unclear and needs to be developed further. Focal point is not consistently maintained throughout the paper.<\/div>\n
3 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Fails to identify a relevant research topic or is not clearly defined and\/or the paper lacks focus throughout.<\/div>\n
\/ 10 pts<\/div>\n
Analysis<\/div>\n
30 to >25 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares\/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.<\/div>\n
25 to >18 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Demonstrates an understanding and some critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Adequately compares\/contrasts perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions but broader connections and\/or implications are not as thoroughly explored.<\/div>\n
18 to >12 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Demonstrates general understanding with limited critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Summarizes perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions.<\/div>\n
12 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Demonstrates a lack of understanding and inadequate analysis of the research topic and thesis. Analysis is superficial based on opinions and preferences rather than critical analysis.<\/div>\n
\/ 30 pts<\/div>\n
Evidence (Sources)<\/div>\n
30 to >25 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Provides compelling and accurate evidence to support in-depth the central position. Research sources are highly relevant, accurate, and reliable and add to the strength of the paper; and are effectively referenced and cited throughout the paper.<\/div>\n
25 to >18 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Provides essential, accurate evidence to support the central position with the required (7) research sources including 1 source from a periodical database that are mostly relevant, accurate, and reliable. Sources are referenced and cited appropriately throughout the paper for the most part.<\/div>\n
18 to >12 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Provides some evidence to support the central position with only a few research sources. Some sources may not be relevant, accurate, and reliable and\/or appropriately referenced and cited in the paper.<\/div>\n
12 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Lacks sufficient research sources to support the central position and\/or, if included, are generally not relevant, accurate, or reliable. Contains numerous factual mistakes, omissions, or oversimplifications. Sources, if included, are not properly referenced and cited in the paper.<\/div>\n
\/ 30 pts<\/div>\n
Organization<\/div>\n
10 to >8 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flow smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, Reference List, etc.).<\/div>\n
8 to >6 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is adequately organized. Ideas are arranged reasonably with a progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes required components (introduction, body, conclusion, Reference List, etc.) for the most part.<\/div>\n
6 to >4 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is somewhat organized, although occasionally ideas from paragraph to paragraph may not flow well and\/or connect to the central position or be clear as a whole. May be missing a required component and\/or components may be less than complete.<\/div>\n
4 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Paper lacks logical organization and impedes readers\u2019 comprehension of ideas. Central position is rarely evident from paragraph to paragraph and\/or the paper is missing multiple required components.<\/div>\n
\/ 10 pts<\/div>\n
Writing Quality & Formatting<\/div>\n
10 to >8 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is well written and clear using APA guidelines and standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors.<\/div>\n
8 to >6 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Paper shows above average writing style and clarity in writing using standard English and following APA guidelines. Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and\/or formatting.<\/div>\n
6 to >4 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Paper shows an average and\/or casual writing style using standard English and following APA guidelines. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, usage, and\/or formatting.<\/div>\n
4 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Paper shows a below average\/poor writing style lacking in elements of appropriate standard English and following proper APA guidelines. Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and\/or formatting.<\/div>\n
\/ 10 pts<\/div>\n
Timeliness & Length<\/div>\n
10 to >8 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is submitted by the deadline and meets the required length (6-8 pages for the body).<\/div>\n
8 to >6 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is submitted within 1 day (24 hours) after the deadline and meets the required length (6-8 pages for the body).<\/div>\n
6 to >3 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is submitted 1-2 days (25-48 hours) after the deadline and\/or is somewhat lacking (or exceeds) the required length.<\/div>\n
3 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is submitted 2-3 days (49-72 hours) or more after the deadline and\/or substantially lacks\/exceeds the required length.<\/div>\n
\/ 10 pts<\/div>\n
Total Points: 0<\/div>\n
Choose a submission typeaper Rubric<\/div>\n
Criteria\tRatings\tPts<\/div>\n
Purpose\/Problem Statement<\/div>\n
10 to >8 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Identifies a relevant research topic and a thesis that provides direction for the paper that is engaging and thought provoking, The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the paper.<\/div>\n
8 to >6 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Identifies a relevant research topic and a thesis that provides adequate direction for the paper with some degree of interest for the reader. The thesis states the position, premise, or hypothesis, and is the focal point of the paper for the most part.<\/div>\n
6 to >3 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Identifies a research topic but may be too broad in scope and\/or the thesis is somewhat unclear and needs to be developed further. Focal point is not consistently maintained throughout the paper.<\/div>\n
3 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Fails to identify a relevant research topic or is not clearly defined and\/or the paper lacks focus throughout.<\/div>\n
\/ 10 pts<\/div>\n
Analysis<\/div>\n
30 to >25 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares\/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.<\/div>\n
25 to >18 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Demonstrates an understanding and some critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Adequately compares\/contrasts perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions but broader connections and\/or implications are not as thoroughly explored.<\/div>\n
18 to >12 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Demonstrates general understanding with limited critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Summarizes perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions.<\/div>\n
12 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Demonstrates a lack of understanding and inadequate analysis of the research topic and thesis. Analysis is superficial based on opinions and preferences rather than critical analysis.<\/div>\n
\/ 30 pts<\/div>\n
Evidence (Sources)<\/div>\n
30 to >25 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Provides compelling and accurate evidence to support in-depth the central position. Research sources are highly relevant, accurate, and reliable and add to the strength of the paper; and are effectively referenced and cited throughout the paper.<\/div>\n
25 to >18 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Provides essential, accurate evidence to support the central position with the required (7) research sources including 1 source from a periodical database that are mostly relevant, accurate, and reliable. Sources are referenced and cited appropriately throughout the paper for the most part.<\/div>\n
18 to >12 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Provides some evidence to support the central position with only a few research sources. Some sources may not be relevant, accurate, and reliable and\/or appropriately referenced and cited in the paper.<\/div>\n
12 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Lacks sufficient research sources to support the central position and\/or, if included, are generally not relevant, accurate, or reliable. Contains numerous factual mistakes, omissions, or oversimplifications. Sources, if included, are not properly referenced and cited in the paper.<\/div>\n
\/ 30 pts<\/div>\n
Organization<\/div>\n
10 to >8 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flow smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, Reference List, etc.).<\/div>\n
8 to >6 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is adequately organized. Ideas are arranged reasonably with a progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes required components (introduction, body, conclusion, Reference List, etc.) for the most part.<\/div>\n
6 to >4 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is somewhat organized, although occasionally ideas from paragraph to paragraph may not flow well and\/or connect to the central position or be clear as a whole. May be missing a required component and\/or components may be less than complete.<\/div>\n
4 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Paper lacks logical organization and impedes readers\u2019 comprehension of ideas. Central position is rarely evident from paragraph to paragraph and\/or the paper is missing multiple required components.<\/div>\n
\/ 10 pts<\/div>\n
Writing Quality & Formatting<\/div>\n
10 to >8 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is well written and clear using APA guidelines and standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors.<\/div>\n
8 to >6 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Paper shows above average writing style and clarity in writing using standard English and following APA guidelines. Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and\/or formatting.<\/div>\n
6 to >4 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Paper shows an average and\/or casual writing style using standard English and following APA guidelines. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, usage, and\/or formatting.<\/div>\n
4 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Paper shows a below average\/poor writing style lacking in elements of appropriate standard English and following proper APA guidelines. Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and\/or formatting.<\/div>\n
\/ 10 pts<\/div>\n
Timeliness & Length<\/div>\n
10 to >8 pts<\/div>\n
Exceeds expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is submitted by the deadline and meets the required length (6-8 pages for the body).<\/div>\n
8 to >6 pts<\/div>\n
Meets expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is submitted within 1 day (24 hours) after the deadline and meets the required length (6-8 pages for the body).<\/div>\n
6 to >3 pts<\/div>\n
Progressing towards expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is submitted 1-2 days (25-48 hours) after the deadline and\/or is somewhat lacking (or exceeds) the required length.<\/div>\n
3 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Does not meet expectations<\/div>\n
Paper is submitted 2-3 days (49-72 hours) or more after the deadline and\/or substantially lacks\/exceeds the required length.<\/div>\n
\/ 10 pts<\/div>\n
Total Points: 0<\/div>\n
Choose a submission type<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I have included the instructions as well as the rubric for this midterm paper. I have included both annotated bibliography(AB) 1 and 2 for your references, however AB 1 was found to have non relevant sources for the assignment so you will need to find add’l sources. The sources should be PRIMARY sources only, so […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[190],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/17244"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17244"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/17244\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=17244"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=17244"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=17244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}