{"id":16517,"date":"2023-04-22T17:34:40","date_gmt":"2023-04-22T17:34:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/pick-one-federal-policy-that-was-discussed-over-a-span-of-two-different-administrations\/"},"modified":"2023-04-22T17:34:40","modified_gmt":"2023-04-22T17:34:40","slug":"pick-one-federal-policy-that-was-discussed-over-a-span-of-two-different-administrations","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/pick-one-federal-policy-that-was-discussed-over-a-span-of-two-different-administrations\/","title":{"rendered":"Pick one federal policy that was discussed over a span of two different administrations"},"content":{"rendered":"

3 to 4 pages including the references and everything in the rubic has to included<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
Pick one federal policy that was discussed over a span of two different administrations. For example, health care policies under Presidents Clinton and Obama, or foreign policy under Presidents George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In addition to the Strayer Library, you may want to use the following resources as you develop your paper:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
American Politics: Presidency and the ExecutiveLinks to an external site. to assist you in identifying a policy.<\/div>\n
For concepts and terms referencing public policy purpose and outcomes, see What Is Public Policy?Links to an external site.<\/div>\n
Write a 3\u20134 page paper in which you:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Discuss the historical perspective of the time when the policy was discussed or implemented. Indicate the context or the problem of the day and the urgency for the policy.<\/div>\n
Analyze the social, economic, and political environments for the time the policy was discussed or implemented.<\/div>\n
Critique the policy for its effectiveness at that time.<\/div>\n
Include at least four peer-reviewed references (no more than five years old) from material outside the textbook. Note: Appropriate peer-reviewed references include scholarly articles and governmental websites. Wikipedia, other wikis, and any other websites ending in anything other than “.gov” do not qualify as peer-reviewed. Use Basic Search: Strayer University Online Library to identify references.<\/div>\n
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Assess the effectiveness of a federal policy in terms of the historical perspectives and the social, economic, and political environments of the time.<\/div>\n
Historical Perspective<\/div>\n
Historical Perspective<\/div>\n
Criteria Ratings Pts<\/div>\n
Discuss the historical perspective of the time when the policy was discussed or implemented. Indicate the context or the problem of the day and the urgency for the policy (25%).<\/div>\n
view longer description<\/div>\n
28.75 to >25.87 pts<\/div>\n
Exemplary<\/div>\n
Thoroughly discussed the historical perspective of the time when the policy was discussed or implemented. Thoroughly indicated the context or the problem of the day and the urgency for the policy.<\/div>\n
25.87 to >22.99 pts<\/div>\n
Competent<\/div>\n
Satisfactorily discussed the historical perspective of the time when the policy was discussed or implemented. Satisfactorily indicated the context or the problem of the day and the urgency for the policy.<\/div>\n
22.99 to >20.12 pts<\/div>\n
Needs Improvement<\/div>\n
Partially discussed the historical perspective of the time when the policy was discussed or implemented. Partially indicated the context or the problem of the day and the urgency for the policy.<\/div>\n
20.12 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Unacceptable<\/div>\n
Did not submit or incompletely discussed the historical perspective of the time when the policy was discussed or implemented. Incompletely indicated the context or the problem of the day and the urgency for the policy.<\/div>\n
\/ 28.75 pts<\/div>\n
Analyze the social, economic, and political environments for the time the policy was discussed or implemented (30%).<\/div>\n
view longer description<\/div>\n
34.5 to >31.04 pts<\/div>\n
Exemplary<\/div>\n
Thoroughly analyzed the social, economic, and political environments for the time the policy was discussed or implemented.<\/div>\n
31.04 to >27.59 pts<\/div>\n
Competent<\/div>\n
Satisfactorily analyzed the social, economic, and political environments for the time the policy was discussed or implemented.<\/div>\n
27.59 to >24.14 pts<\/div>\n
Needs Improvement<\/div>\n
Partially analyzed the social, economic, and political environments for the time the policy was discussed or implemented.<\/div>\n
24.14 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Unacceptable<\/div>\n
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the social, economic, and political environments for the time the policy was discussed or implemented.<\/div>\n
\/ 34.5 pts<\/div>\n
Critique the policy for its effectiveness of the time (30%).<\/div>\n
view longer description<\/div>\n
34.5 to >31.04 pts<\/div>\n
Exemplary<\/div>\n
Thoroughly critiqued the policy for its effectiveness of the time.<\/div>\n
31.04 to >27.59 pts<\/div>\n
Competent<\/div>\n
Satisfactorily critiqued the policy for its effectiveness of the time.<\/div>\n
27.59 to >24.14 pts<\/div>\n
Needs Improvement<\/div>\n
Partially critiqued the policy for its effectiveness of the time.<\/div>\n
24.14 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Unacceptable<\/div>\n
Did not submit or incompletely critiqued the policy for its effectiveness of the time.<\/div>\n
\/ 34.5 pts<\/div>\n
Four references (5%).<\/div>\n
view longer description<\/div>\n
5.75 to >5.17 pts<\/div>\n
Exemplary<\/div>\n
Exceeds the required number of references; all references are high-quality choices.<\/div>\n
5.17 to >4.59 pts<\/div>\n
Competent<\/div>\n
Meets the required number of references; all references are high-quality choices.<\/div>\n
4.59 to >4.02 pts<\/div>\n
Needs Improvement<\/div>\n
Meets the required number of references; some or all references are poor-quality choices.<\/div>\n
4.02 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Unacceptable<\/div>\n
Does not meet the required number of references.<\/div>\n
\/ 5.75 pts<\/div>\n
Clarity and writing mechanics (10%).<\/div>\n
view longer description<\/div>\n
11.5 to >10.34 pts<\/div>\n
Exemplary<\/div>\n
0\u20132 errors present.<\/div>\n
10.34 to >9.19 pts<\/div>\n
Competent<\/div>\n
3\u20134 errors present.<\/div>\n
9.19 to >8.04 pts<\/div>\n
Needs Improvement<\/div>\n
5\u20136 errors present.<\/div>\n
8.04 to >0 pts<\/div>\n
Unacceptable<\/div>\n
More than six errors present.<\/div>\n
\/ 11.5 pts<\/div>\n
Total Points: 0<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
or<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Drag a file here, or click to select a file to upload<\/div>\n
Drag a file here, or<\/div>\n
Choose a file to upload<\/div>\n
No file chosen<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
I agree to the tool’s End-User License Agreement<\/div>\n
This assignment submission is my own, original work<\/div>\n
Previous<\/div>\n
Week 3 Discussion – Distribution of Wealth<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Next<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

3 to 4 pages including the references and everything in the rubic has to included Pick one federal policy that was discussed over a span of two different administrations. For example, health care policies under Presidents Clinton and Obama, or foreign policy under Presidents George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush. In addition to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[706],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/16517"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16517"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/16517\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=16517"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=16517"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=16517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}