{"id":13957,"date":"2023-04-13T16:46:01","date_gmt":"2023-04-13T16:46:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/legal-research-paper-examine-a-recent-dispute-involving-a-multinational-corporation\/"},"modified":"2023-04-13T16:46:01","modified_gmt":"2023-04-13T16:46:01","slug":"legal-research-paper-examine-a-recent-dispute-involving-a-multinational-corporation","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/legal-research-paper-examine-a-recent-dispute-involving-a-multinational-corporation\/","title":{"rendered":"Legal Research Paper  &#8211; Examine a recent dispute involving a multinational corporation"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>Choose a legal issue that was the subject of a lecture\/ reading (for example, contracts, intellectual property, negligence, or private international law), and prepare a 750-850 word research paper that examines its practical impact on a multinational business (for example, an international contract law lawsuit; the valuation of the intellectual property portfolio of a pharma giant; an employment law dispute over workplace discrimination).<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Ensure you include discussion of the following required elements:<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Your thesis: introduce and close your paper with an insightful conclusion you have reached based on your research.&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Legal context:  state clearly which specific legal issue you will discuss (for example, contracts, workplace discrimination, trade law, or immigration).<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Business relevance: the business context in which you will discuss this issue (for example, a specific lawsuit; a decision by a judicial body such as the World Trade Organization; or a legal campaign by a civil society group such as Human Rights Watch, Global March Against Child Labor, or the World Wide Fund for Nature).<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Legal analysis:  which laws were alleged to have been broken?  In which country was the case heard?  Which court(s) ruled on the case?<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Business analysis of the legal issues involved: revenues affected, costs from the legal action and business outcome.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Other business issues: for example, public relations concerns, impact on employees, community impact in the places where the company operates, and any other issues you think relevant.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Continuing challenges: what ongoing issues does your chosen company face and what potential solutions can you identify?<\/div>\n<div>Example research paper topics<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>You can write on any of these, or propose your own topic to me for approval:<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Contracts<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Corporate contract law dispute. For example, Baily, A. (2021, April 10). Walmart ordered to pay $115 million for breach of contract, stealing trade secrets. ArkansasTimes.comLinks to an external site.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Corporations<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Incorporation in low tax jurisdictions. For example, Carden, D. (2020, July 16). To Pay for the Pandemic, Dry Out the Tax Havens: Corporations and the wealthy have stashed away as much as $36 trillion in untaxed money. It&#8217;s time to bring the hammer down. ForeignPolicyLinks to an external site..<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Intellectual Property<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Mattel&#8217;s 2008 lawsuit against MGA for copying Barbie dolls with its Bratz line: Mattel Inc. v. MGA Entertainment IncLinks to an external site.. See Lepore, J. (2018, January 22). When Barbie Went to War with Bratz: How a legal battle over intellectual property exposed a cultural battle over sex, gender roles, and the workplace. NewYorker.comLinks to an external site..&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div>U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1994 finding that 2 Live Crew did not violate copyright with their song &#8220;Pretty Woman.&#8221; Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.Links to an external site.<\/div>\n<div>London court&#8217;s 2006 decision that The Da Vinci Code book by Dan Brown did not violate the copyright of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail (an earlier book on a related subject). Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh v. The Random House Group LimitedLinks to an external site..  See The Guardian (2007, March 28): Authors lose appeal over Da Vinci Code plagiarism. TheGuardian.comLinks to an external site..<\/div>\n<div>U.S. court decision in 2008 that Napster violated record label copyrights, which forced the company to cease operations. A&amp;M Records, Inc. v. Napster Inc.Links to an external site.&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div>Reuters (2021, April 6): Nike wins halt to sales of Lil Nas X \u2018Satan Shoes.\u2019 CNBCLinks to an external site..&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div>Constitutional Law<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A U.S. government action. For example, President Trump&#8217;s Executive OrderLinks to an external site. requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok or have it banned from use in the United States, and its continuing repercussionsLinks to an external site..&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Employment Law<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Workplace sexual harassment. For example:<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Reeves v. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.Links to an external site.: 2008 U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeal&#8217;s decision about daily exposure to offensive language and radio programming.<\/div>\n<div>Burlington Northern &amp; Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteLinks to an external site.: 2006 U.S. Supreme Course decision about retaliation claims for workplace sexual harassment.<\/div>\n<div>Investigation finds Utah County clerk\/auditor sexually harassed employee, violating policyLinks to an external site.: 2021 Utah case about employer sexual harassment (additional report about the same case: Utah County clerk\/auditor called employee her \u2018gay democratic assistant,\u2019 according to harassment investigationLinks to an external site.).<\/div>\n<div>Criminal Law\/ Negligence<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A negligence case. For example, Redden, E. (2021, March 19). Dream Derailed Leads to Lawsuit Against Berkeley: A former international student has filed suit claiming the university&#8217;s international student advising office misinformed him of a deadline to apply for authorization to work in the U.S. InsideHigherEd.comLinks to an external site..&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>International Law<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A global social justice campaign. For example, IKEA and Save the ChildrenLinks to an external site..&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Trade<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A national trade dispute. For example, the EU&#8217;s decision to impose tariffs on Chinese aluminiumLinks to an external site..&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>World Trade Organization matter. For example, negotiations over fishing subsidiesLinks to an external site..&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Immigration<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>National immigration policy. For example, in the U.S.: Krogstad, J. M. and Gonzalez-Barrera, A. (2021, March 22): Key facts about U.S. immigration policies and Biden\u2019s proposed changes. PewResearch.org.Links to an external site.&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Consumer Protection<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A consumer protection lawsuit. For example, Stop Lying&#8217;: Muslim Rights Group Sues Facebook Over Claims It Removes Hate Groups.Links to an external site.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Taxation<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Global tax havens and banking secrecy. For example, the case of Bradley BirkenfeldLinks to an external site..  See Javers, E (2015, April 30): Why did the US pay this former Swiss banker $104M? CNBC.comLinks to an external site..<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Rubric<\/div>\n<div>Analytic Writing Assignment<\/div>\n<div>Analytic Writing Assignment<\/div>\n<div>Criteria\tRatings\tPts<\/div>\n<div>This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis\/Main Idea<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>Excellent<\/div>\n<div>Clearly presents a main idea appropriate to the topic\/assignment and supports it throughout the paper.<\/div>\n<div>13 pts<\/div>\n<div>Good<\/div>\n<div>There is a main idea appropriate to the topic\/assignment and it is supported throughout most of the paper.<\/div>\n<div>7 pts<\/div>\n<div>Satisfactory<\/div>\n<div>There is a main idea that is sufficiently well connected to the topic\/assignment, but it is only weakly supported throughout the paper.<\/div>\n<div>3 pts<\/div>\n<div>Inadequate<\/div>\n<div>There is a vague sense of a main idea or the main idea is not connected to the topic\/assignment and\/or it is weakly supported throughout the paper.<\/div>\n<div>0 pts<\/div>\n<div>Unacceptable<\/div>\n<div>No main idea.<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>Excellent<\/div>\n<div>Exceptionally well presented and argued. Ideas are detailed, well developed, and supported with specific evidence and facts, as well as examples and specific details.<\/div>\n<div>13 pts<\/div>\n<div>Good<\/div>\n<div>Well-presented and argued. Ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific.<\/div>\n<div>7 pts<\/div>\n<div>Satisfactory<\/div>\n<div>Content is generally sound. Ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported. The analysis uses some evidence, but it is usually of a generalized nature.<\/div>\n<div>3 pts<\/div>\n<div>Inadequate<\/div>\n<div>Content is confusing and\/or difficult to follow. Ideas are unclear and undersupported. The analysis is based on little to no evidence.<\/div>\n<div>0 pts<\/div>\n<div>Unacceptable<\/div>\n<div>Content is poorly conceived and\/or impossible to follow.<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>Excellent<\/div>\n<div>Uses appropriate academic resources. Sources are exceptionally well integrated and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively. References are appropriately cited In APA style.<\/div>\n<div>13 pts<\/div>\n<div>Good<\/div>\n<div>Uses appropriate academic resources. Sources are well integrated and support the paper\u2019s claims.<\/div>\n<div>7 pts<\/div>\n<div>Satisfactory<\/div>\n<div>Some references used in the paper may not qualify as appropriate academic resources. Sources support some claims made in the paper but might not be well-integrated within the paper\u2019s argument.<\/div>\n<div>3 pts<\/div>\n<div>Inadequate<\/div>\n<div>The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not well-integrated.<\/div>\n<div>0 pts<\/div>\n<div>Unacceptable<\/div>\n<div>Little to no research content.<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of writing and organization<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>Excellent<\/div>\n<div>Writing is clear, concise, and unambiguous. Organization is careful and logical. Essay is generally free of spelling and grammar errors.<\/div>\n<div>13 pts<\/div>\n<div>Good<\/div>\n<div>Writing is generally clear, with some minor problems. Essay is generally well-organized with room for improvement. There are occasional errors in grammar or spelling.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>7 pts<\/div>\n<div>Satisfactory<\/div>\n<div>Writing is often unclear and may sometimes impede understanding. Essay is disorganized and lacks structure. There are repeated spelling and grammar mistakes.<\/div>\n<div>3 pts<\/div>\n<div>Inadequate<\/div>\n<div>Quality of writing impedes understanding. Essay is incoherent. There are grammar and spelling mistakes throughout. Overall tone may be careless or inappropriate.<\/div>\n<div>0 pts<\/div>\n<div>Unacceptable<\/div>\n<div>Quality of writing prohibits understanding.<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>Total Points: 100<\/div>\n<div><span style=\"background-color: transparent; color: var(--color-1); font-variant-caps: inherit;\">erkeley: A former international student has filed suit claiming the university&#8217;s international student advising office misinformed him of a deadline to apply for authorization to work in the U.S. InsideHigherEd.comLinks to an external site..&nbsp;<\/span><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>International Law<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A global social justice campaign. For example, IKEA and Save the ChildrenLinks to an external site..&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Trade<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A national trade dispute. For example, the EU&#8217;s decision to impose tariffs on Chinese aluminiumLinks to an external site..&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>World Trade Organization matter. For example, negotiations over fishing subsidiesLinks to an external site..&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Immigration<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>National immigration policy. For example, in the U.S.: Krogstad, J. M. and Gonzalez-Barrera, A. (2021, March 22): Key facts about U.S. immigration policies and Biden\u2019s proposed changes. PewResearch.org.Links to an external site.&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Consumer Protection<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>A consumer protection lawsuit. For example, Stop Lying&#8217;: Muslim Rights Group Sues Facebook Over Claims It Removes Hate Groups.Links to an external site.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Taxation<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Global tax havens and banking secrecy. For example, the case of Bradley BirkenfeldLinks to an external site..  See Javers, E (2015, April 30): Why did the US pay this former Swiss banker $104M? CNBC.comLinks to an external site..<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Rubric<\/div>\n<div>Analytic Writing Assignment<\/div>\n<div>Analytic Writing Assignment<\/div>\n<div>Criteria\tRatings\tPts<\/div>\n<div>This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis\/Main Idea<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>Excellent<\/div>\n<div>Clearly presents a main idea appropriate to the topic\/assignment and supports it throughout the paper.<\/div>\n<div>13 pts<\/div>\n<div>Good<\/div>\n<div>There is a main idea appropriate to the topic\/assignment and it is supported throughout most of the paper.<\/div>\n<div>7 pts<\/div>\n<div>Satisfactory<\/div>\n<div>There is a main idea that is sufficiently well connected to the topic\/assignment, but it is only weakly supported throughout the paper.<\/div>\n<div>3 pts<\/div>\n<div>Inadequate<\/div>\n<div>There is a vague sense of a main idea or the main idea is not connected to the topic\/assignment and\/or it is weakly supported throughout the paper.<\/div>\n<div>0 pts<\/div>\n<div>Unacceptable<\/div>\n<div>No main idea.<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>Excellent<\/div>\n<div>Exceptionally well presented and argued. Ideas are detailed, well developed, and supported with specific evidence and facts, as well as examples and specific details.<\/div>\n<div>13 pts<\/div>\n<div>Good<\/div>\n<div>Well-presented and argued. Ideas are detailed, developed and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific.<\/div>\n<div>7 pts<\/div>\n<div>Satisfactory<\/div>\n<div>Content is generally sound. Ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported. The analysis uses some evidence, but it is usually of a generalized nature.<\/div>\n<div>3 pts<\/div>\n<div>Inadequate<\/div>\n<div>Content is confusing and\/or difficult to follow. Ideas are unclear and undersupported. The analysis is based on little to no evidence.<\/div>\n<div>0 pts<\/div>\n<div>Unacceptable<\/div>\n<div>Content is poorly conceived and\/or impossible to follow.<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>Excellent<\/div>\n<div>Uses appropriate academic resources. Sources are exceptionally well integrated and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively. References are appropriately cited In APA style.<\/div>\n<div>13 pts<\/div>\n<div>Good<\/div>\n<div>Uses appropriate academic resources. Sources are well integrated and support the paper\u2019s claims.<\/div>\n<div>7 pts<\/div>\n<div>Satisfactory<\/div>\n<div>Some references used in the paper may not qualify as appropriate academic resources. Sources support some claims made in the paper but might not be well-integrated within the paper\u2019s argument.<\/div>\n<div>3 pts<\/div>\n<div>Inadequate<\/div>\n<div>The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not well-integrated.<\/div>\n<div>0 pts<\/div>\n<div>Unacceptable<\/div>\n<div>Little to no research content.<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of writing and organization<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>Excellent<\/div>\n<div>Writing is clear, concise, and unambiguous. Organization is careful and logical. Essay is generally free of spelling and grammar errors.<\/div>\n<div>13 pts<\/div>\n<div>Good<\/div>\n<div>Writing is generally clear, with some minor problems. Essay is generally well-organized with room for improvement. There are occasional errors in grammar or spelling.<\/div>\n<div>7 pts<\/div>\n<div>Satisfactory<\/div>\n<div>Writing is often unclear and may sometimes impede understanding. Essay is disorganized and lacks structure. There are repeated spelling and grammar mistakes.<\/div>\n<div>3 pts<\/div>\n<div>Inadequate<\/div>\n<div>Quality of writing impedes understanding. Essay is incoherent. There are grammar and spelling mistakes throughout. Overall tone may be careless or inappropriate.<\/div>\n<div>0 pts<\/div>\n<div>Unacceptable<\/div>\n<div>Quality of writing prohibits understanding.<\/div>\n<div>25 pts<\/div>\n<div>Total Points: 100<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Choose a legal issue that was the subject of a lecture\/ reading (for example, contracts, intellectual property, negligence, or private international law), and prepare a 750-850 word research paper that examines its practical impact on a multinational business (for example, an international contract law lawsuit; the valuation of the intellectual property portfolio of a pharma [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[224],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/13957"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13957"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/13957\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=13957"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=13957"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=13957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}