{"id":11515,"date":"2023-04-01T05:11:09","date_gmt":"2023-04-01T05:11:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/how-should-walmart-deal-with-female-employees-and-gender-discrimination-face-by-them\/"},"modified":"2023-04-01T05:11:09","modified_gmt":"2023-04-01T05:11:09","slug":"how-should-walmart-deal-with-female-employees-and-gender-discrimination-face-by-them","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/how-should-walmart-deal-with-female-employees-and-gender-discrimination-face-by-them\/","title":{"rendered":"How should Walmart deal with Female Employees and Gender discrimination face by them"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><b><font size=\"3\">As sources only Use Secondary Sources like academic articles, online resources, news media, etc.<\/font><\/b><\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<p>WRITING YOUR ADVISORY REPORT (Maximum length: 4000-5000 words. Note: page guidelines for each<\/p>\n<div>component are provided as a reference, but feel free to adjust as appropriate for your report.)\n<\/div>\n<div>COMM 306 Winter 2023\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Title Page: Choose an accurate title. A good title should be enticing and clearly indicate what the\n<\/div>\n<div>reader will learn from the Advisory Report. Identify who the report is prepared for, who it has\n<\/div>\n<div>been prepared by, and the date of submission.\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Table of Contents\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Executive Summary (1\/2 page): Provide a concise summary of the problem, analysis findings,\n<\/div>\n<div>alternatives, and recommendations. This is like a snapshot of the key points of your entire report.\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Introduction &amp; Description of Issue (1 page): This section includes information on the problem\n<\/div>\n<div>and clearly describes the purpose of the report. Specifically, what is the issue\/problem your\n<\/div>\n<div>report is hoping to address? The issue must be clearly explained and placed in context to ensure\n<\/div>\n<div>its importance is understood by the reader. Briefly highlight any historical events\/factors that\n<\/div>\n<div>have led up to this situation. Provide enough background information to help your client\n<\/div>\n<div>understand the complexities of the issue and better understand the key points of controversy.\n<\/div>\n<div>Explain the contents of the report and how this report will help your client address this issue.\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Situational Analysis (1-2 pages): Use the PESTEL framework to discuss the current and emergent\n<\/div>\n<div>factors or trends in the external environment that are impacting the situation. What is the\n<\/div>\n<div>current political, economic, sociocultural, technological, environmental, and legal context in\n<\/div>\n<div>which this issue is occurring? As you identify relevant factors clearly explain why these factors are\n<\/div>\n<div>important to consider when it comes to this issue.\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Stakeholder Analysis (2 pages): Complete a detailed analysis of stakeholders using the\n<\/div>\n<div>power\/interest matrix mapping tool and narrative summaries as appropriate to structure your\n<\/div>\n<div>analysis and communicate your findings. You may find the following guiding questions helpful as\n<\/div>\n<div>you conduct your analysis:\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Identification: Who has a vested interest in this situation and in future decisions\n<\/div>\n<div>made related to this issue? Note: when identifying stakeholders, consider who is\n<\/div>\n<div>going to be impacted by decisions made, as well as who might have the ability to\n<\/div>\n<div>influence strategic\/operational decisions and positively\/negatively impact this\n<\/div>\n<div>situation in the future or contribute to the escalation or resolution of the issue.\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Perspective: What are the views of these stakeholders on the issue? What is\n<\/div>\n<div>important to them? What is their level of interest in this situation?\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Power: How much power do these stakeholders have to influence the situation\n<\/div>\n<div>and\/or decisions made related to this issue? What are some of the tactics these\n<\/div>\n<div>stakeholders may use to exert and\/or gain power in this situation?\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Analysis Findings (1 page): Synthesize the key insights arising from your situational and\n<\/div>\n<div>stakeholder analysis. Based on your analysis, describe what stage of the issue life cycle the issue\n<\/div>\n<div>appears to be in and why an effective response\/resolution to this issue is important to your client\n<\/div>\n<div>and relevant stakeholders. What are the most important factors that surfaced through your\n<\/div>\n<div>literature review and analysis that should be considered moving forward? What are the critical\n<\/div>\n<div>challenges or threats? What are some potential opportunities? What is the role of the client in\n<\/div>\n<div>this situation and what is the scope of their power and authority (i.e. what level of influence do\n<\/div>\n<div>they hold when it comes to addressing this issue)? Explain what a successful solution to this issue\n<\/div>\n<div>must address or accomplish by identifying 3-5 clear goals\/objectives.\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Alternatives (1-2 pages): Outline three valid alternatives for resolving the issue. These\n<\/div>\n<div>alternatives should present three different courses of action that could be pursued going\n<\/div>\n<div>forward. By exploring different options, you help minimize bias and strengthen the credibility of\n<\/div>\n<div>your recommendation. Provide a clear description of each alternative explaining how it connects\n<\/div>\n<div>to the findings from your research and analysis. Complete a detailed pros\/cons analysis of each\n<\/div>\n<div>option.\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Recommendation (1 page): Develop 3-5 decision criteria to evaluate your alternatives. Use a\n<\/div>\n<div>decision criteria matrix to conduct your analysis. Based on the findings of your pros\/cons analysis\n<\/div>\n<div>and your criteria analysis, make a recommendation as to the optimal \u201cgo-forward\u201d strategy,\n<\/div>\n<div>clearly explaining your rationale for choosing this option. Discuss how this recommendation best\n<\/div>\n<div>addresses the issue, takes into account the conflicting interests of key stakeholders, achieves\n<\/div>\n<div>organizational goals, and promotes the common good ethically and strategically. Your solution\n<\/div>\n<div>should be desirable (make sense to\/for people), viable (able to be accomplished), sustainable\n<\/div>\n<div>(able to become part of a long-term strategy), and ethical (minimize harm\/maximize benefits).\n<\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Risk Analysis (1 page): Conduct a detailed risk analysis of your recommendation. Highlight 4 or 5\n<\/div>\n<div>foreseeable risks, conflicts, or challenges that your client may face if they choose to implement\n<\/div>\n<div>this recommendation. Assess the likelihood and impact of each risk and suggest some tangible\n<\/div>\n<div>ways to navigate each risk as this strengthens the credibility of your recommendation.\n<\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Conclusion (1\/4 page): Finish with a brief summary or concluding remarks.\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 References: Use in-text citations and reference all sources used to develop the Advisory Report.\n<\/div>\n<div>Follow APA documentation rules.\n<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\u2022 Appendices: Include supporting materials that are relevant to some readers but not all or may be\n<\/div>\n<div>too bulky to include in the body of the report (e.g. supplementary information, data tables, or\n<\/div>\n<div>large graphics). Title them Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C if there are more than one and\n<\/div>\n<div>refer to them in the body of the report.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As sources only Use Secondary Sources like academic articles, online resources, news media, etc. WRITING YOUR ADVISORY REPORT (Maximum length: 4000-5000 words. Note: page guidelines for each component are provided as a reference, but feel free to adjust as appropriate for your report.) COMM 306 Winter 2023 \u2022 Title Page: Choose an accurate title. A [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[1139],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/11515"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11515"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/11515\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11515"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=11515"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=11515"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=11515"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}