{"id":11485,"date":"2023-03-31T22:03:43","date_gmt":"2023-03-31T22:03:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/glenda-battey-and-vicki-ebbecks-a-qualitative-exploration-of-an-experiential-education-bully-prevention-curriculum\/"},"modified":"2023-03-31T22:03:43","modified_gmt":"2023-03-31T22:03:43","slug":"glenda-battey-and-vicki-ebbecks-a-qualitative-exploration-of-an-experiential-education-bully-prevention-curriculum","status":"publish","type":"questions","link":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/questions\/glenda-battey-and-vicki-ebbecks-a-qualitative-exploration-of-an-experiential-education-bully-prevention-curriculum\/","title":{"rendered":"Glenda Battey and Vicki Ebbeck’s \u201cA Qualitative Exploration of an Experiential Education Bully Prevention Curriculum\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

Instructions<\/p>\n

Purpose: Practice analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing sources in preparation for your Synthesis Essay, both in writing and via a short oral\/video presentation.\n<\/div>\n
This assessment will also serve to verify your identity in this course. In addition to your bibliography and presentation, you will need to submit a photo of your student ID or state-issued ID. You can cover your address, ID number, or other identifying information with a post it note or sticker, but your face and name should be clear. This identification verification process is required to pass the course, and is in lieu of an in-person or virtually proctored exam.\n<\/div>\n
Tasks:\n<\/div>\n
In Discussion 4.2, you located two sources (one of which was required to be scholarly) to help you verify or refute your selected text from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d list. Note your professor\u2019s previous comments and seek help (from one of the online librarians or your professor) with locating sources, particularly if you are struggling to locate an additional scholarly source.\n<\/div>\n
Now, you will write an individual annotated bibliographic entry for all three texts (the article that inspired your research from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d list and the two texts that you located). For each source that you have selected, complete the following:\n<\/div>\n
Begin with the MLA works cited entry for the text. Note that EbscoHost (in Galileo) will provide you with the MLA citation if you click \u201cCite\u201d on the right-hand panel [and, scroll to the MLA entry]. Also, note that the works cited entry for the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d has been provided, in the \u201cdescription\u201d section (below the article\u2019s title).\n<\/div>\n
Then, write a well-developed paragraph that summarizes, evaluates, and reflects on and\/or synthesizes each individual source. Make sure that each paragraph contains specific information (not general observations that could apply to any one of the sources). Note that a single quote (per source) may be included\u2014but the quote must be no more than one (fully) typed line. Take the following steps:\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that summarize the article\/source\u2019s main argument and claims; be specific when summarizing the text and include parenthetical citations when appropriate.\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that evaluate what evidence and examples the source uses to support its main focus\/claims. Briefly explain the source\u2019s merits\u2014and\/or deficiencies\u2014in terms of logic, persuasion, credibility, etc. Consider whether the author(s) effectively presented her\/his\/their claims\u2014and how. Also, consider whether the author\u2019s information is reliable. Keep in mind that your evaluation does not need to be only positive or negative; the source may be adept in certain areas, but not in others.\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that reflect on how the article\/source relates to the other two sources that you have selected. Consider what new information and perspectives the text provides\u2014and how it \u201cadds\u201d to the ongoing conversation (in the other texts) about your topic. It may be helpful to imagine the author meeting the authors of your other sources\u2014what would she\/he \u201csay\u201d? On what points would they agree and\/or disagree.\n<\/div>\n
Instructions\n<\/div>\n
Purpose: Practice analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing sources in preparation for your Synthesis Essay, both in writing and via a short oral\/video presentation.\n<\/div>\n
This assessment will also serve to verify your identity in this course. In addition to your bibliography and presentation, you will need to submit a photo of your student ID or state-issued ID. You can cover your address, ID number, or other identifying information with a post it note or sticker, but your face and name should be clear. This identification verification process is required to pass the course, and is in lieu of an in-person or virtually proctored exam.\n<\/div>\n
Tasks:\n<\/div>\n
In Discussion 4.2, you located two sources (one of which was required to be scholarly) to help you verify or refute your selected text from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d list. Note your professor\u2019s previous comments and seek help (from one of the online librarians or your professor) with locating sources, particularly if you are struggling to locate an additional scholarly source.\n<\/div>\n
Now, you will write an individual annotated bibliographic entry for all three texts (the article that inspired your research from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d list and the two texts that you located). For each source that you have selected, complete the following:\n<\/div>\n
Begin with the MLA works cited entry for the text. Note that EbscoHost (in Galileo) will provide you with the MLA citation if you click \u201cCite\u201d on the right-hand panel [and, scroll to the MLA entry]. Also, note that the works cited entry for the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d has been provided, in the \u201cdescription\u201d section (below the article\u2019s title).\n<\/div>\n
Then, write a well-developed paragraph that summarizes, evaluates, and reflects on and\/or synthesizes each individual source. Make sure that each paragraph contains specific information (not general observations that could apply to any one of the sources). Note that a single quote (per source) may be included\u2014but the quote must be no more than one (fully) typed line. Take the following steps:\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that summarize the article\/source\u2019s main argument and claims; be specific when summarizing the text and include parenthetical citations when appropriate.\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that evaluate what evidence and examples the source uses to support its main focus\/claims. Briefly explain the source\u2019s merits\u2014and\/or deficiencies\u2014in terms of logic, persuasion, credibility, etc. Consider whether the author(s) effectively presented her\/his\/their claims\u2014and how. Also, consider whether the author\u2019s information is reliable. Keep in mind that your evaluation does not need to be only positive or negative; the source may be adept in certain areas, but not in others.\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that reflect on how the article\/source relates to the other two sources that you have selected. Consider what new information and perspectives the text provides\u2014and how it \u201cadds\u201d to the ongoing conversation (in the other texts) about your topic. It may be helpful to imagine the author meeting the authors of your other sources\u2014what would she\/he \u201csay\u201d? On what points would they agree and\/or disagree.\n<\/div>\n
Instructions\n<\/div>\n
Purpose: Practice analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing sources in preparation for your Synthesis Essay, both in writing and via a short oral\/video presentation.\n<\/div>\n
This assessment will also serve to verify your identity in this course. In addition to your bibliography and presentation, you will need to submit a photo of your student ID or state-issued ID. You can cover your address, ID number, or other identifying information with a post it note or sticker, but your face and name should be clear. This identification verification process is required to pass the course, and is in lieu of an in-person or virtually proctored exam.\n<\/div>\n
Tasks:\n<\/div>\n
In Discussion 4.2, you located two sources (one of which was required to be scholarly) to help you verify or refute your selected text from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d list. Note your professor\u2019s previous comments and seek help (from one of the online librarians or your professor) with locating sources, particularly if you are struggling to locate an additional scholarly source.\n<\/div>\n
Now, you will write an individual annotated bibliographic entry for all three texts (the article that inspired your research from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d list and the two texts that you located). For each source that you have selected, complete the following:\n<\/div>\n
Begin with the MLA works cited entry for the text. Note that EbscoHost (in Galileo) will provide you with the MLA citation if you click \u201cCite\u201d on the right-hand panel [and, scroll to the MLA entry]. Also, note that the works cited entry for the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d has been provided, in the \u201cdescription\u201d section (below the article\u2019s title).\n<\/div>\n
Then, write a well-developed paragraph that summarizes, evaluates, and reflects on and\/or synthesizes each individual source. Make sure that each paragraph contains specific information (not general observations that could apply to any one of the sources). Note that a single quote (per source) may be included\u2014but the quote must be no more than one (fully) typed line. Take the following steps:\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that summarize the article\/source\u2019s main argument and claims; be specific when summarizing the text and include parenthetical citations when appropriate.\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that evaluate what evidence and examples the source uses to support its main focus\/claims. Briefly explain the source\u2019s merits\u2014and\/or deficiencies\u2014in terms of logic, persuasion, credibility, etc. Consider whether the author(s) effectively presented her\/his\/their claims\u2014and how. Also, consider whether the author\u2019s information is reliable. Keep in mind that your evaluation does not need to be only positive or negative; the source may be adept in certain areas, but not in others.\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that reflect on how the article\/source relates to the other two sources that you have selected. Consider what new information and perspectives the text provides\u2014and how it \u201cadds\u201d to the ongoing conversation (in the other texts) about your topic. It may be helpful to imagine the author meeting the authors of your other sources\u2014what would she\/he \u201csay\u201d? On what points would they agree and\/or disagree.\n<\/div>\n
Instructions\n<\/div>\n
Purpose: Practice analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing sources in preparation for your Synthesis Essay, both in writing and via a short oral\/video presentation.\n<\/div>\n
This assessment will also serve to verify your identity in this course. In addition to your bibliography and presentation, you will need to submit a photo of your student ID or state-issued ID. You can cover your address, ID number, or other identifying information with a post it note or sticker, but your face and name should be clear. This identification verification process is required to pass the course, and is in lieu of an in-person or virtually proctored exam.\n<\/div>\n
Tasks:\n<\/div>\n
In Discussion 4.2, you located two sources (one of which was required to be scholarly) to help you verify or refute your selected text from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d list. Note your professor\u2019s previous comments and seek help (from one of the online librarians or your professor) with locating sources, particularly if you are struggling to locate an additional scholarly source.\n<\/div>\n
Now, you will write an individual annotated bibliographic entry for all three texts (the article that inspired your research from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d list and the two texts that you located). For each source that you have selected, complete the following:\n<\/div>\n
Begin with the MLA works cited entry for the text. Note that EbscoHost (in Galileo) will provide you with the MLA citation if you click \u201cCite\u201d on the right-hand panel [and, scroll to the MLA entry]. Also, note that the works cited entry for the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Articles\u201d has been provided, in the \u201cdescription\u201d section (below the article\u2019s title).\n<\/div>\n
Then, write a well-developed paragraph that summarizes, evaluates, and reflects on and\/or synthesizes each individual source. Make sure that each paragraph contains specific information (not general observations that could apply to any one of the sources). Note that a single quote (per source) may be included\u2014but the quote must be no more than one (fully) typed line. Take the following steps:\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that summarize the article\/source\u2019s main argument and claims; be specific when summarizing the text and include parenthetical citations when appropriate.\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that evaluate what evidence and examples the source uses to support its main focus\/claims. Briefly explain the source\u2019s merits\u2014and\/or deficiencies\u2014in terms of logic, persuasion, credibility, etc. Consider whether the author(s) effectively presented her\/his\/their claims\u2014and how. Also, consider whether the author\u2019s information is reliable. Keep in mind that your evaluation does not need to be only positive or negative; the source may be adept in certain areas, but not in others.\n<\/div>\n
Write 2-3 sentences that reflect on how the article\/source relates to the other two sources that you have selected. Consider what new information and perspectives the text provides\u2014and how it \u201cadds\u201d to the ongoing conversation (in the other texts) about your topic. It may be helpful to imagine the author meeting the authors of your other sources\u2014what would she\/he \u201csay\u201d? On what points would they agree and\/or disagree.\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Grading Criteria:\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
One article from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Article\u201d list; one additional scholarly article from Galileo; and one additional source that may be popular, professional, or scholarly\n<\/div>\n
Correct MLA guidelines for citations\n<\/div>\n
Developed paragraphs that engage specific ideas in the texts (not general observations) for the distinct purposes of analysis, evaluation, and synthesis\n<\/div>\n
Clear, grammatically correct proseGrading Criteria:\n<\/div>\n
One article from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Article\u201d list; one additional scholarly article from Galileo; and one additional source that may be popular, professional, or scholarly\n<\/div>\n
Correct MLA guidelines for citations\n<\/div>\n
Developed paragraphs that engage specific ideas in the texts (not general observations) for the distinct purposes of analysis, evaluation, and synthesis\n<\/div>\n
Clear, grammatically correct proseGrading Criteria:\n<\/div>\n
One article from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Article\u201d list; one additional scholarly article from Galileo; and one additional source that may be popular, professional, or scholarly\n<\/div>\n
Correct MLA guidelines for citations\n<\/div>\n
Developed paragraphs that engage specific ideas in the texts (not general observations) for the distinct purposes of analysis, evaluation, and synthesis\n<\/div>\n
Clear, grammatically correct proseGrading Criteria:\n<\/div>\n
One article from the \u201cStudent-Selected Scholarly Article\u201d list; one additional scholarly article from Galileo; and one additional source that may be popular, professional, or scholarly\n<\/div>\n
Correct MLA guidelines for citations\n<\/div>\n
Developed paragraphs that engage specific ideas in the texts (not general observations) for the distinct purposes of analysis, evaluation, and synthesis\n<\/div>\n
Clear, grammatically correct prose<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n
\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Instructions Purpose: Practice analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing sources in preparation for your Synthesis Essay, both in writing and via a short oral\/video presentation. This assessment will also serve to verify your identity in this course. In addition to your bibliography and presentation, you will need to submit a photo of your student ID or state-issued […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"disciplines":[706],"paper_types":[],"tagged":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/11485"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/questions"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11485"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/questions\/11485\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"disciplines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/disciplines?post=11485"},{"taxonomy":"paper_types","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/paper_types?post=11485"},{"taxonomy":"tagged","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.goodacademic.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tagged?post=11485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}